All reviews of published articles are made public. This includes manuscript files, peer review comments, author rebuttals and revised materials. Note: This was optional for articles submitted before 13 February 2023.
Peer reviewers are encouraged (but not required) to provide their names to the authors when submitting their peer review. If they agree to provide their name, then their personal profile page will reflect a public acknowledgment that they performed a review (even if the article is rejected). If the article is accepted, then reviewers who provided their name will be associated with the article itself.
Dear Authors
Your revision has been reviewed by the experts in the field, and we recognize that the revision is sufficiently justified and has been improved. Your submission is now endorsed by two experts for acceptance of publication in PeerJ. Congratulations!!!
Thank you for submitting your article to PeerJ. I would like to express my gratitude for your contributions and efforts to the scientific community. I look forward to receiving your research and review articles in the future.
Best Regards
Yung-Sheng Chen, Ph.D.
Academic Editor
[# PeerJ Staff Note - this decision was reviewed and approved by Jafri Abdullah, a PeerJ Section Editor covering this Section #]
The authors politely responded to my comments, and I believe they revised the paper well.
I don't think there's a problem.
It is believed that the results are reasonable.
There are no additional comments.
No comment
No comment
No comment
The authors have provided the necessary clarifications and responses to my previous comments. I have no further inquiries.
**PeerJ Staff Note:** Please ensure that all review, editorial, and staff comments are addressed in a response letter and that any edits or clarifications mentioned in the letter are also inserted into the revised manuscript where appropriate.
The Introduction is too long in the structure of the Abstract. Please include only the important points and enrich the Methods and Results to convey the excellence of this study.
In the second paragraph of the introduction section, please simplify the introduction of the questionnaire and emphasize why the JSS is needed. If so many questionnaires already exist, there is no need to focus on the development of the JSS.
I was just wondering, is there any legal problem with ethics approval only in Malaysia while it was conducted in China?
The method describes the collection of various background data. Please summarize these data in a table and present them in a way that is clear to the reader.
Consequently, based on the small values of ΔCFI and ΔTLI, we can assume strict invariance of this model across both men and women. -> This paragraph does not present any data to support this conclusion. Perhaps this is something that should be included in the next paragraph?
It seems to me that the first and second paragraphs of the Discussion section are the same content, just reworded. Please either rewrite them to make the point clearer, or put them together briefly in one paragraph.
Mainor points
Please spell out CFA.
additional pertinent particulars -> Please state specifically, as it is vague.
No comment
I failed to understand the actual study setting. The authors mention that the study was conducted in Jiangsu province, which has more than 50 universities. In which of these did the authors recruit their sample? The fact that 85% of the sample is medical students limits the possible setting to a medical university. The first author's affiliation is a medical university, but it is located in Anhui province instead of Jiangsu. Can the authors be more specific about the institutions where recruitment took place?
The fact that mostly medical students participated in this survey limits the generalizability of the study and should be mentioned as a study limitation.
Abbreviations like CFA, CR, and AVE are not explained in the manuscript text.
All text and materials provided via this peer-review history page are made available under a Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.