All reviews of published articles are made public. This includes manuscript files, peer review comments, author rebuttals and revised materials. Note: This was optional for articles submitted before 13 February 2023.
Peer reviewers are encouraged (but not required) to provide their names to the authors when submitting their peer review. If they agree to provide their name, then their personal profile page will reflect a public acknowledgment that they performed a review (even if the article is rejected). If the article is accepted, then reviewers who provided their name will be associated with the article itself.
In its original submission to the InCoB2013 meeting, this manuscript had received two contradicting comments. Although PeerJ recommends the handling editor to collect at least four reviews, I hereby make an exceptional decision of acceptance with those two reviews partly because I admit that the authors' replies to the reviewers' comments are reasonable and partly because I also have a positive opinion about the suitability of this manuscript as a reviewer.
All text and materials provided via this peer-review history page are made available under a Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.