Citation sources

Updated weekly. Details via Crossref
Crossref Scopus Google Scholar
42 42 Search
2025
An Aberrant Abundance of Cronbach’s Alpha Values at .70
Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science
2025
Coregistration of EEG and eye-tracking in infants and developing populations
Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics
2023
Tempest in a teacup: An analysis of p-Hacking in organizational research
PLOS ONE
2023
Multimodality matters in numerical communication
Frontiers in Psychology
2023
Empirical evidence of widespread exaggeration bias and selective reporting in ecology
Nature Ecology & Evolution
2023
The trustworthiness of the cumulative knowledge in industrial/organizational psychology: The current state of affairs and a path forward
Acta Psychologica
2023
How do psychology researchers interpret the results of multiple replication studies?
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
2023
Reckoning With Our Crisis: An Agenda for the Field of Social and Personality Psychology
Perspectives on Psychological Science
2023
Big little lies: a compendium and simulation ofp-hacking strategies
Royal Society Open Science
2023
Are most published research findings false? Trends in statistical power, publication selection bias, and the false discovery rate in psychology (1975–2017)
PLOS ONE
2022
Transparent, Open, and Reproducible Prevention Science
Prevention Science
2022
Replication concerns in sports and exercise science: a narrative review of selected methodological issues in the field
Royal Society Open Science
2021
International Encyclopedia of Transportation
2021
Implications of the open science era for educational psychology research syntheses
Educational Psychologist
2020
The Theory of Statistics in Psychology
2020
P-hacking in clinical trials and how incentives shape the distribution of results across phases
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2020
p-value Problems? An Examination of Evidential Value in Criminology
Journal of Quantitative Criminology
2019
Research practices and statistical reporting quality in 250 economic psychology master's theses: a meta-research investigation
Royal Society Open Science
2019
Raiders of the lost HARK: a reproducible inference framework for big data science
Palgrave Communications
2019
The Prevalence of Marginally Significant Results in Psychology Over Time
Psychological Science
2019
Quantifying evidential value and selective reporting in recent and 10-year past psychophysiological literature: A pre-registered P-curve analysis
International Journal of Psychophysiology
2019
P-curving the fusiform face area: Meta-analyses support the expertise hypothesis
Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
2019
Correcting for Bias in Psychology: A Comparison of Meta-Analytic Methods
Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science
2019
A 20-Year Review of Outcome Reporting Bias in Moderated Multiple Regression
Journal of Business and Psychology
2019
Detecting Evidential Value and p-Hacking With the p-Curve Tool
Zeitschrift für Psychologie
2019
Publication bias examined in meta-analyses from psychology and medicine: A meta-meta-analysis
PLOS ONE
2019
Reporting errors and biases in published empirical findings: Evidence from innovation research
Research Policy
2018
P‐Hacking in Headache Research
Headache: The Journal of Head and Face Pain
2018
Peer-Review Guidelines Promoting Replicability and Transparency in Psychological Science
Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science
2018
A Meta-Analytic Re-Appraisal of the Framing Effect
Zeitschrift für Psychologie
2018
The Impact of P -hacking on “Redefine Statistical Significance”
Basic and Applied Social Psychology
2018
Quantifying Support for the Null Hypothesis in Psychology: An Empirical Investigation
Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science
2017
Empirical assessment of published effect sizes and power in the recent cognitive neuroscience and psychology literature
PLOS Biology
2017
The Weak Spots in Contemporary Science (and How to Fix Them)
Animals
2017
Estimating the evidential value of significant results in psychological science
PLOS ONE
2017
Significance Testing in Accounting Research: A Critical Evaluation Based on Evidence
SSRN Electronic Journal
2017
Too Good to be False: Nonsignificant Results Revisited
Collabra: Psychology
2017
Reanalyzing Head et al. (2015): investigating the robustness of widespreadp-hacking
PeerJ
2016
688,112 Statistical Results: Content Mining Psychology Articles for Statistical Test Results
Data
2016
Conducting Meta-Analyses Based on p Values
Perspectives on Psychological Science
2016
Editorial: Evidence on Questionable Research Practices: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly
Journal of Business and Psychology
Additional cited-by details will be shown when available from Crossref