All reviews of published articles are made public. This includes manuscript files, peer review comments, author rebuttals and revised materials. Note: This was optional for articles submitted before 13 February 2023.
Peer reviewers are encouraged (but not required) to provide their names to the authors when submitting their peer review. If they agree to provide their name, then their personal profile page will reflect a public acknowledgment that they performed a review (even if the article is rejected). If the article is accepted, then reviewers who provided their name will be associated with the article itself.
After revisions, all reviewers agreed to publish the manuscript. I also reviewed the manuscript and found no obvious risks to publication. Therefore, I also approved the publication of this manuscript.
well done
good
good
The article in revised form is ready forv publications.
Revised manuscript was improved and satisfied.
Revised manuscript was improved and satisfied.
Revised manuscript was improved and satisfied.
NA
The reviews range from Accept (R3) to major Revisions (R2). Please address all concerns, and this submission will then be re-evaluated
1- Introduction is not sufficient regarding the domain of review and what will added
2- Please clarify inclusion criteria among studied articles
3-Please added more details in artificial intelligence section with more clinical applicatinos
This is a retrospective systematic review with meta-analysis study
well done but conclusion should be condensed
Please clarify abbreviations, authors contributions, standards of reporting, ORCID of authors
1、Language and Grammar:
Overall Clarity: It is recommended to proofread the entire text to ensure clarity and professionalism in language. For example, sentences like "By 2020, the number of patients with POAG and PACG is estimated to reach" need to be reorganized for improved readability and accuracy. Consider having an English professional familiar with medical terminology proofread the document.
Specific Phrases: The wording in sentences on lines 23, 77, 121, and 128 currently makes it difficult to understand. Please revise these sentences to enhance clarity and conciseness.
2、Introduction and Background:
This article provides valuable insights into the application of AS-OCT in glaucoma research. However, significant revisions are needed in terms of clarity, methodological rigor, and comprehensiveness of literature citations to meet high academic standards.
1、Statistical rigor: Ensure that statistical analysis is rigorous and appropriate for the data. Provide rationale for selecting these analytical methods, particularly utilizing the methods of VOS viewer and CiteSpace.
2、Reproducibility: Methods should be described in detail so that other researchers can replicate the study. This includes search strategies, data extraction processes, and analysis techniques.
1、Relevance to the original research question: Ensure that the conclusions are directly related to the research question proposed in the introduction. Provide a detailed discussion on the implications of the research findings, considering their impact on future research and clinical practice.
2、Unresolved issues: Identify any unresolved issues or gaps that need to be addressed in future research. This will help drive the development of the field and guide new research directions.
NA
No comment
No comment
No Comment
I think there might be some interest in the ethnic base of the many studies. Is it possible to analyse the data to fully separate European and Asian populations? It would be useful to know which of the US articles are strongly biased in favour of recruitment of white European ethnic groups. Also do any of the studies include a substantial group of African/African origin patients?
Otherwise I found this a well written and fascinating study, of great value to any researcher in the area. However I am not familiar with the methodology and so am not able to comment on the analyses carried out
All text and materials provided via this peer-review history page are made available under a Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.