All reviews of published articles are made public. This includes manuscript files, peer review comments, author rebuttals and revised materials. Note: This was optional for articles submitted before 13 February 2023.
Peer reviewers are encouraged (but not required) to provide their names to the authors when submitting their peer review. If they agree to provide their name, then their personal profile page will reflect a public acknowledgment that they performed a review (even if the article is rejected). If the article is accepted, then reviewers who provided their name will be associated with the article itself.
I can confirm as per reviewers that the authors have addressed all of the reviewers' comments, and I have reviewed the manuscript for amendments as well. The manuscript is ready for publication.
Greetings and Regards
Amendments are approved
No comment
No comment
No comment
The authors have addressed the given suggestions and improved the manuscript. Therefore, there are no more comments for this study.
No comments
Authors have addressed the validity findings.
This is a very good study and looking forward to seeing this study publication.
Your paper is very interesting and important research but before we can consider further for publication, you will need to address the following:
* Please address the comments from all reviewers 1 and 3, specifically, shorten the introduction and briefly describe the rationale
* Please describe the sample size estimation, on what basis did you decide to include 191 nurses
* In the conceptual model of the safety, please clearly indicate which ones are latent variables and which are the manifest variables
* In the structural model, label each path with the path coefficients
* Please comment on the identifiability and specification of the model. You may refer to the following journal article on how to report
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3755633/
* You also need to present the fit indices (the reviewers did not ask for this but it is important to write these details for the benefit of the readers to evaluate your findings)
* The results and discussion section needs to address the findings from your models
**PeerJ Staff Note:** Please ensure that all review, editorial, and staff comments are addressed in a response letter and that any edits or clarifications mentioned in the letter are also inserted into the revised manuscript where appropriate.
In abstract section, line 32, add KEYWORDS.
In introduction section, line 150, add research questions.
In Materials & Methods section, add description of the general characteristic of the studied nurses (gender, Participation in The Accreditation Program for Healthcare Organizations, Status, and Department) to Measurements.
In Materials & Methods section, line 156, add duration of data collection to Sampling and Data Collection.
In Materials & Methods section, line 160, more details about study sample like sample size, method of selection, if there any inclusion or exclusion criteria should be included.
No comment
In discuss section, line 276, the citation of reference should be (park, oh, & kim, 2017)
In reference section, line 472, revised this reference.
No comment.
no comment
No comment
Dear authors,
the research study presents variables in relation to patient safety where nurses have important competence. The study highlighted nurses' management of a patient safety culture, establishing the need for education and ensuring an environment and control for patient safety.
Adequate measurement tools used and statistical evaluation of the results testify to the mastered rigour of the research.
Dear authors,
Congratulations on conducting a very important study.
Kindly refer to the attached file for improvements to this study.
All the best!
"Not relevant to this study"
"no comment"
Please refer to the attached file.
The English in your text is generally clear and professional. The literature cited provides a thorough understanding of patient safety issues, competency development, and organizational culture.
the paper reviewed is a descriptive correlational study report.
The research methods described are sufficient.
The results presented are generally valid, with a good fit for the hypothesized model and meaningful relationships among the variables.
The direct impact of safety education on safety control and competency could be further explored, possibly through improved measurement or more focused educational interventions.
The study provides valuable insights into the indirect effects of safety education on patient safety competencies through perceptions of safety culture and control.
addressing the limitations and expanding the scope of research could enhance the understanding and effectiveness of patient safety interventions.
Emphasizing the role of nurses’ perceptions of safety culture and control in the effectiveness of safety education provides valuable insights for improving training programs.
All text and materials provided via this peer-review history page are made available under a Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.