All reviews of published articles are made public. This includes manuscript files, peer review comments, author rebuttals and revised materials. Note: This was optional for articles submitted before 13 February 2023.
Peer reviewers are encouraged (but not required) to provide their names to the authors when submitting their peer review. If they agree to provide their name, then their personal profile page will reflect a public acknowledgment that they performed a review (even if the article is rejected). If the article is accepted, then reviewers who provided their name will be associated with the article itself.
Dear Dr. Cheng:
Thank you for submitting your article to PeerJ. After review by the peer reviewers, your article has been accepted.
Sincerely
Ana María Jiménez-Cebrián
[# PeerJ Staff Note - this decision was reviewed and approved by Jafri Abdullah, a PeerJ Section Editor covering this Section #]
yes
yes
yes
none
Dear Dr. Cheng,
Thank you for your submission to PeerJ. After review by two reviewers, your article requires some revision: Major Revisions. Both reviewers agree that Major Revisions are necessary, please review the changes suggested by the reviewers point by point and note that Reviewer 1 has provided an annotated manuscript as a PDF attachment.
Thank you.
There is no consistency in the focus of the discussion between the abstract discussing globally, the introduction discussing Covid 19, and the discussion discussing Chinese culture.
if the cultural background is to be underlined. In the method, especially the population and sample, the characteristics of the respondents are written, such as native Chinese parents with a Chinese mindset.
no comment
No Comment
Parenting style is influenced by culture; this needs to be connected at the beginning of the introduction and abstract. so that it becomes synchronized from the abstract, introduction, and discussion. did not suddenly appear in the discussion section.
culture is more suitable for use in background and introduction.
Thank you for inviting me to review this paper, which explores the influence of parenting styles and coping strategies on anxiety symptoms in adolescents, specifically comparing groups with and without nonsuicidal self-injury behavior. The manuscript is concise and understandable. Here are some suggestions for improvement:
1、Please rewrite the abstract to make it more engaging and less lengthy.
2、Consider shortening and refining the Introduction and Discussion sections to enhance clarity and focus.
3、Try to incorporate more recent high-level articles into the references to strengthen the paper's academic standing.
Research question well defined, relevant & meaningful.
Conclusions are well stated,
All text and materials provided via this peer-review history page are made available under a Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.