Morphological, molecular and 3D synchrotron X-ray tomographic characterizations of Helicascus satunensis sp. nov., a novel mangrove fungus

National Biobank of Thailand, National Center for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology (BIOTEC), National Science and Technology Development Agency (NSTDA), Khlong Nueng, Khlong Luang, Pathum Thani, Thailand
Department of Marine and Coastal Resources, Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment, Laksi, Bangkok, Thailand
Synchrotron Light Research Institute (Public Organization), Nakhon Ratchasima, Thailand
School of Science, Walailak University, Nakhon Si Thammarat, Thailand
DOI
10.7717/peerj.18341
Academic Editor
Subject Areas
Mycology, Taxonomy
Keywords
Ascomycota, Marine fungi, 3D synchrotron, Helicascus
Copyright
© 2024 Preedanon et al.
Licence
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited.
Cite this article
Preedanon S, Klaysuban A, Suetrong S, Pracharoen O, Promchoo W, Sangtiean T, Rojviriya C, Sakayaroj J. 2024. Morphological, molecular and 3D synchrotron X-ray tomographic characterizations of Helicascus satunensis sp. nov., a novel mangrove fungus. PeerJ 12:e18341

Abstract

A new species of Helicascus satunensis sp. nov. was collected on mature dead fruits of the Nypa palm in Satun Province, southern Thailand. Its morphological characteristics are similar to those of the genus Helicascus. Recently, a genus Helicascus with three species from marine habitats worldwide was studied. The morphology of this fungus was investigated and combined with multigene sequence analyzes of small subunit (SSU), large subunit (LSU), internal transcribed spacer (ITS) ribosomal DNA, translation elongation factor 1-alpha (TEF-1α) and RNA polymerase II (RPB2) genes. Morphologically, H. satunensis sp. nov. is characterized by semi-immersed, lenticular ascomata, multilocules, a bitunicate ascus and smooth, obovoid, dark brown ascospores that are one-septate and unequally two-celled. In addition, 3D visualization using synchrotron X-ray tomography was performed to investigate the interaction between fruiting body and substrata. Molecular phylogeny with multigene revealed that H. satunensis sp. nov. belongs to the family Morosphaeriaceae, order Pleosporales, class Dothideomycetes. Furthermore, H. satunensis sp. nov. forms a well-supported clade with Helicascus species described from marine habitats. Based on the unique morphological and molecular evidence, we propose this fungus, H. satunensis sp. nov., as a new species for Helicascus.

Introduction

Kohlmeyer (1969) described the distinct marine ascomycete Helicascus obtained from dead prop roots of the mangrove Rhizophora mangle. A type species, Helicascus kanaloanus, is characterized by an immersed ascostroma composed of multilocules that share a common periphysate ostiole lying under pseudostromatic tissues. The asci are subcylindrical bitunicate and pediculated, and the endoascus is usually coiled at the base. The ascospores are brown to dark brown at maturity and are frequently asymmetrically two-celled with a mucilaginous sheath in this species (Kohlmeyer, 1969).

Since 1991, a number of Helicascus-like species have been described from freshwater and marine habitats based on their common morphological characteristics and DNA sequences (Hyde, 1991; Zhang et al., 2013; Zhang et al., 2014; Zhang et al., 2015; Luo et al., 2016; Preedanon et al., 2017; Zhang et al., 2024). However, two new genera, Aquihelicascus and Neohelicascus, were excluded from the genus Helicascus due to their morphological and multigene phylogeny (Dong et al., 2020). Aquihelicascus was established to accommodate one new combination and two new species. Neohelicascus was introduced to accommodate one new species and seven new combinations (Dong et al., 2020).

Recently, three marine species in the genus Helicascus were identified, H. kanaloanus, H. nypae and H. mangrovei, based on morphological and molecular data (Kohlmeyer, 1969; Hyde, 1991; Preedanon et al., 2017). Helicascus nypae was found on Nypa palm fronds from Southeast Asia. It is characterized as having ascomata with immersed multilocules with a single common central ostiole, bitunicate asci with a long, narrow and coiled endoascus, and unequally two-celled, verrucose ascospores surrounded by a gelatinous sheath (Hyde, 1991). Subsequently, Preedanon et al. (2017) reported H. mangrovei obtained from decaying mangrove wood in Thailand. The unique morphological characteristics of H. mangrovei include multilocular ascomata semi-immersed under a thick clypeus that forms pseudostromata, clavate pedicellate asci in a hamathecium of cellular pseudoparaphyses, dark brown color at maturity, and unequally two-celled ascospores with one apiculate end.

The aim of this study is to report on novel ascomycete found in Thai mangrove habitats. The microscopic morphology of the fungal fruiting bodies and host tissues was visualized in three dimensions using synchrotron radiation X-ray tomography, which enables high-resolution and non-invasive visualization of internal features without the need for serial sections and staining reagents. This capability is simply unattainable with conventional characterization tools (Friis et al., 2014; Sena et al., 2022; Becher, Sheppard & Grunwaldt, 2023). Furthermore, we provide the molecular phylogeny of the combined SSU, LSU, ITS rDNA, TEF-1α and RPB2 sequences to confirm their taxonomic position.

Materials and Methods

Sample collection, isolation, morphological examination, and materials availability

Mature dead Nypa palm fruits were collected from mangroves at Mangrove Forest Resource Development Station 36 in Satun Province, southern Thailand (6°54′14.9616″N and 99°41′17.4912″E). Collecting procedure was made as previously described in Preedanon et al. (2017). The collected Nypa palm fruits were placed in a sealed plastic Ziploc bag and brought back to the laboratory for further examination. The specimens were washed with natural seawater in order to remove sediment and other debris then kept in a moist plastic box and incubated at room temperature (approximately 25–28 °C). The samples were examined directly under a stereo-zoom microscope for the presence of H. satunensis sp. nov. Photographic documentation of the sporulating structures was carried out using the Olympus BX51 and Olympus DP21 software (Olympus, Tokyo). The ascomata specimens were fixed with embedding matrix on stage and cutting sections through a cryostat microtome (MEV; SLEE Mainz, Mainz, Germany). The fresh ascomata of H. satunensis sp. nov. were selected for single spore isolation (Vrijmoed, 2000). Spore suspension was diluted and plated on 1.5% seawater corn meal agar (SCMA) medium with the addition of antibiotics (streptomycin sulfate 0.5 g/L, penicillin G 0.5 g/L). The germinated spores were placed onto freshly SCMA medium and incubated at room temperature (approximately 25–28 °C) (Preedanon et al., 2017). Axenic cultures (BCC 83546, BCC 86189, BCC 86190) were then transferred to 1.5% seawater potato dextrose agar (SPDA). Colony characteristics, growth and sporulation were observed and recorded. The type cultures were deposited at the BIOTEC Culture Collection (BCC), Pathum Thani, Thailand. In addition, dried voucher type specimens (BBH 50658, BBH 50659 and BBH 50660) were deposited at BIOTEC Bangkok Herbarium (BBH), Pathum Thani, Thailand.

Three-dimensional synchrotron X-ray tomography

The microstructure of the fungal fruiting bodies and the outer exocarp of Nypa palm fruit was visualized in three dimensions using synchrotron radiation X-ray tomographic microscopy (SRXTM). Prior to the SRXTM experiment, the fresh fungal fruiting bodies samples were fixed with 3% formaldehyde. For tomographic imaging, each sample was placed in a sample holder attached to a brass stub with glue to stabilize the sample during tomography scanning. The SRXTM examination of the samples was carried out at the X-ray tomographic microscopy beamline (BL1.2W: XTM) at the Siam Photon Source Facility, Synchrotron Light Research Institute. The X-ray beam was generated from a 2.2-Tesla multipole wiggler radiation source optimized with a toroidal focusing mirror and filtered with aluminum foils to achieve an average energy of 10 keV. All X-ray projections were acquired with a pixel size of 3.61 µm using an imaging system consisting of a 2X objective lens-coupled microscope (Optique Peter, Lentilly, France), a YAG-Ce scintillator (CRYTUR, Turnov, Czech Republic) and the PCO.edge 5.5 sCMOS camera (Excelitas PCO GmbH, Kelheim, Germany). To enhance fine details of the entire sample, a tomographic volume was reconstructed from enlarged composite projections obtained from multiple scans. Each scan covered 180°with a step of 0.2°, resulting in a dataset. Subsequently, the X-ray projection datasets underwent pre-processing, which included flat-field correction, beam intensity normalization and image stitching. Tomographic reconstruction was performed using Octopus Reconstruction software (TESCAN, Ghent, Belgium). The resulting computed tomographic slices were analyzed using ImageJ (http://rsbweb.nih.gov/ij/) and Fiji (http://fiji.sc/Fiji), and the 3D visualization of the tomographic volume was displayed using Drishti software (Limaye, 2012).

DNA extraction, PCR amplification and DNA sequencing

Genomic DNA from fungal mycelia was extracted according to the methods of O’Donnell et al. (1997) and Sakayaroj, Pang & Jones (2011). Ribosomal DNA genes (ITS, SSU, LSU) and protein-coding gene sequences (TEF-1α, RPB2) were amplified by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). The ITS rDNA region was amplified with the primer pair ITS4/ITS5 (White et al., 1990), the SSU region with NS1/NS4 (White et al., 1990), the LSU region with LROR/LR5 (Vilgalys & Hester, 1990), the TEF1-α region with EF1-983F/EF1-2218R (Rehner & Buckley, 2005), the RPB2 region with fRPB2-5F/fRPB2-7cR (Liu, Whelen & Hall, 1999) (Table 1). The component of PCR reaction was performed in a total volume of 50 µL, containing 1 µL DNA template (30–50 ng/ µL), 1 µL of each forward and reverse primers (10 µM), 10 µL master mix of Taq DNA polymerase (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Waltham, MA, USA) and 37 µL of double-distilled water. The PCR conditions for all the genes used were set up using the T100TM thermal cycler (BIO-RAD Laboratories, Inc., California) (Table 1). The PCR products were subsequently purified and sequenced by Macrogen (Seoul, South Korea).

Table 1:
PCR primers and amplification profiles used in this study.
DNA region Primer name Amplification profile Reference
Denaturation Repeat steps Extension
Internal transcribed spacer rDNA (ITS) ITS5 ITS4 94 °C (2 min) 35 cycles
94 °C (1 min)
54 °C (1 min)
72 °C (2 min)
72 °C (10 min) White et al. (1990)
18S small subunit rDNA (SSU) NS1 NS4 94 °C
(2 min)
35 cycles
94 °C (1 min)
55 °C (1 min)
72 °C (2 min)
72 °C
(10 min)
White et al. (1990)
28S large subunit rDNA (LSU) LROR LR5 94 °C
(2 min)
35 cycles
94 °C (1 min)
55 °C (1.5 min)
72 °C (2.5 min)
72 °C
(10 min)
Vilgalys & Hester (1990)
Translation elongation factor 1-alpha (TEF 1-α) EF1-983F EF1-2218R 95 °C
(2 min)
35 cycles
95 °C (1 min)
54 °C (1 min)
72 °C (2 min)
72 °C
(10 min)
Rehner & Buckley (2005)
RNA polymerase II second largest subunit (RPB2) fRPB2-5F fRPB2-7cR 94 °C
(3 min)
35 cycles
94 °C (1 min)
54 °C (1 min)
72 °C (1.5 min)
72 °C
(8 min)
Liu, Whelen & Hall (1999)
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.18341/table-1
Table 2:
Taxa and sequences database accession numbers used in this study.
Newly generated sequences are indicated in bold.
Taxon Strain GenBank accession no.
LSU
rDNA
SSU
rDNA
ITS
rDNA
TEF-1α RPB2
Aquihelicascus songkhlaensis MFLUCC 18-1154T MN913692 MT627680 MT954380
Aquihelicascus songkhlaensis MFLUCC 18-1273 MN913724 MT864319 MT627696 MT954369 MT878464
Aquihelicascus songkhlaensis MFLUCC 18-1278 MN913726 MT864318 MT627693 MT954366 MT878458
Aquihelicascus thalassioideus MFLUCC 10-0911T KC886636 KC886637 KC886635
Aquihelicascus thalassioideus MJF 14020-2 KP637165 KP637162
Aquihelicascus thalassioideus JCM 17526 AB807558 AB797268 LC014554 AB808534
Aquihelicascus thalassioideus CBS 110441 AB807557 AB797267 LC014553 AB808533
Aquihelicascus thalassioideus KUMCC 19-0094 MT627668 MT627689
Aquihelicascus yunnanensis MFLUCC 18-1025T MN913711 MT864292 MT627728 MT954391
Aquilomyces patris CBS 135661T KP184041 KP184077 KP184002
Aquilomyces patris CBS 135760 KP184042 KP184078 KP184004
Aquilomyces patris CBS 135662 KP184043 KP184079 KP184003
Aquilomyces rebunensis CBS 139684T AB807542 AB797252 AB809630 AB808518
Clypeoloculus akitaensis CBS 139681T AB807543 AB797253 AB809631 AB808519
Clypeoloculus hirosakiensis CBS 139682T AB807550 AB797260 AB809638 AB808526
Clypeoloculus microsporus CBS 139683T AB807535 AB797245 AB811451 AB808510
Clypeoloculus towadaensis CBS 139685T AB807549 AB797259 AB809637 AB808525
Didymella fucicola JK 2932 EF177852 EF192138
Falciformispora lignatilis BCC 21118 GU371827 GU371835 GU371820
Halojulella avicenniae BCC 18422 GU371823 GU371831 GU371816 GU371787
Halojulella avicenniae BCC 20173 GU371822 GU371830 GU371815 GU371786
Halojulella avicenniae JK 5326A GU479790 GU479756
Helicascus kanaloanus A 237 AF053729
Helicascus kanaloanus ATCC 18591 KX639748 KX639744 KX957961 KX639756 KX639752
Helicascus mangrovei BCC 68258T KX639745 KX639741 KX957958 KX639753 KX639749
Helicascus mangrovei BCC 68260 KX639746 KX639742 KX957959 KX639754 KX639750
Helicascus mangrovei BCC 74471 KX639747 KX639743 KX957960 KX639755 KX639751
Helicascus nypae BCC 36751 GU479788 GU479754 GU479854 GU479826
Helicascus nypae BCC 36752 GU479789 GU479755 GU479855 GU479827
Helicascus satunensis BCC 83546T PP866393 PP873998 PP873995 PP915719 PP915722
Helicascus satunensis BCC 86189 PP866394 PP873999 PP873996 PP915720 -
Helicascus satunensis BCC 86190 PP866395 PP874000 PP873997 PP915721 PP915723
Leptosphaeria maculans AFTOL ID-277 DQ470946 DQ470993 DQ471062 DQ470894
Massarina igniaria CBS 845.96 DQ810223 DQ813511
Microvesuvius unicellularis AD 291626 OQ799383 OQ799384 OQ866586
Microvesuvius unicellularis AD 291633T OQ799391 OQ799382 OQ866585
Montagnula opulenta AFTOL ID-1734 DQ678086 AF164370 DQ677984
Morosphaeria muthupetensis PUFD 87T MF614796 MF614797 MF614795 MF614798
Morosphaeria ramunculicola BCC 18404 GQ925853 GQ925838
Morosphaeria ramunculicola BCC 18405 GQ925854 GQ925839
Morosphaeria ramunculicola JK 5304B GU479794 GU479760 GU479831
Morosphaeria ramunculicola KH 220 AB807554 AB797264 AB808530
Morosphaeria velatispora BCC 17059 GQ925852 GQ925841
Morosphaeria velatispora NBRC 107812 AB807556 AB797266 LC014572 AB808532
Neohelicascus aegyptiacus MFLU 12-0060T KC894853 KC894852
Neohelicascus aquaticus KUMCC 19-0107 MT627662 MT864314 MT627719 MT954384
Neohelicascus aquaticus KUMCC 17-0145 MG356477 MG356487 MG356479 MG372317
Neohelicascus aquaticus MFLUCC 17-2300 MG356478 MG356480 MG372316
Neohelicascus aquaticus MFLUCC 10-0918T KC886640 KC886638 KC886639 MT954384
Neohelicascus aquaticus MAFF 243866 AB807532 AB797242 AB809627 AB808507
Neohelicascus chiangraiensis MFLUCC 13-0883T KU900585 KU900587 KU900583 KX455849
Neohelicascus elaterascus MAFF 243867 AB807533 AB797243 AB809626 AB808508
Neohelicascus elaterascus CBS 139689 LC014608 LC014603 LC014552 LC014613
Neohelicascus elaterascus MFLUCC 18-0985 MT627658 MT864335 MT627735
Neohelicascus elaterascus MFLUCC 18-0993 MT627659 MT864333 MT627730
Neohelicascus elaterascus HKUCC 7769 AY787934 AF053727
Neohelicascus gallicus BJFUCC 200228 KM924831 KM924833
Neohelicascus gallicus CBS 123118 KM924832
Neohelicascus gallicus BJFUCC 200224 KM924830
Neohelicascus griseofavus MFLUCC 16-0869T OP377964 OP378041 OP377878 OP473055
Neohelicascus submersus MFLU 20-0436T MT627656 MT864340 MT627742
Neohelicascus unilocularis MJF 14020T KP637166 KP637163
Neohelicascus unilocularis MJF 14020-1 KP637167 KP637164
Neohelicascus uniseptatus MFLUCC 15-0057T KU900584 KU900582 KX455850
Paradendryphiella arenariae AFTOL ID-995T DQ470971 DQ471022 DQ677890 DQ470924
Parastagonospora avenae AFTOL ID-280 AY544684 AY544725 DQ677885 DQ677941
Phaeodothis winteri AFTOL ID-1590 DQ678073 DQ678021 DQ677917 DQ677970
Phaeosphaeria eustoma AFTOL ID-1570 DQ678063 DQ678011 DQ677906 DQ677959
Platychora ulmi CBS 361.52 EF114702 EF114726
Plenodomus biglobosus CBS 303.51 GU301826 GU349010
Setoseptoria arundinacea CBS 619.86 DQ813509 DQ813513
Stemphylium vesicarium CBS 191.86T DQ247804 DQ247812 DQ471090 DQ247794
Trematosphaeria pertusa CBS 122371 FJ201992 FJ201993
Outgroup            
Lophiostoma macrostomum JCM 13544 AB619010 AB618691 JN942961 LC001751 JN993491
Sigarispora arundinis JCM 13550 AB618998 AB618679 JN942964 LC001737 JN993482
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.18341/table-2

Notes:

T

Ex-type strain

Phylogenetic analyses

Multiple sequence alignments were analyzed with the closely matched sequences obtained from GenBank (Table 2) according to Jones et al. (2015), Maharachchikumbura et al. (2016) and Hongsanan et al. (2017), Dong et al. (2020), Yang et al. (2023a) and Yang et al. (2023b). The newly generated sequences from this study are listed in Table 2. The nucleotide sequences were assembled and aligned using BioEdit 7.2.5 (Hall, 1999) and Muscle 3.8.31 (Edgar, 2004). Specifically, NCBI blast searches were used to determine sequence similarity to sequences published in the GenBank database. Phylogenetic analyses of the combined SSU, LSU, ITS rDNA, TEF-1α and RPB2 sequences were performed using maximum likelihood (ML) and Bayesian algorithms. Maximum likelihood (ML) analysis was evaluated in RAxMLHPC2 on XSEDE (Stamatakis, 2014) via the CIPRES Science Gateway platform (Miller, Pfeiffer & Schwartz, 2010) under the GTR + GAMMA model with BFGS method to optimize the GTR rate parameters. Finally, Bayesian posterior probabilities of branches were performed using MrBayes 3.2.6 (Ronquist et al., 2012), with the best-fitting model (GTR+I+G) selected by AIC in MrModeltest 2.2 (Nylander, 2004), which was tested with hierarchical likelihood ratios (hLRTs). Three million generations were run in four Markov chains and a sample was drawn every 100 generations with a burn-in value of 3,000 sampled trees. Finally, the consensus tree was displayed using the interactive Tree Of Life (iTOL) (Letunic & Bork, 2021) and adjusted in Adobe Photoshop 2020. All sequences obtained in this study were submitted to GenBank, and the typification were published in the MycoBank database (Crous et al., 2004). The resulting alignments were submitted to TreeBASE (submission numbers: 31389).

Nomenclature

The electronic version of this article in Portable Document Format (PDF) will represent a published work according to the International Code of Nomenclature for algae, fungi, and plants, and hence the new names contained in the electronic version are effectively published under that Code from the electronic edition alone, so there is no longer any need to provide printed copies. In addition, new names contained in this work have been submitted to MycoBank from where they will be made available to the Global Names Index. The unique MycoBank number can be resolved and the associated information viewed through any standard web browser by appending the MycoBank number contained in this publication (MB 854336) to the prefix http://www.mycobank.org/MB/. The online version of this work is archived and available from the following digital repositories: PeerJ, PubMed Central SCIE, and CLOCKSS.

Results

Taxonomy

Helicascus satunensis Preedanon, Suetrong & Sakay., sp. nov.Fig. 1.
MycoBank (MB#854336)
GenBank (SSU rDNA=PP873998, LSU rDNA=PP866393, ITS rDNA=PP873995, TEF-1α=PP915719, RPB2=PP915722)

Type: THAILAND, Satun Province, mangrove forests, on a piece of dead palm (Nypa fruticans) fruit, 22 December 2016, S. Preedanon, A. Klaysuban, O. Pracharoen & J. Sakayaroj, BBH 50658, holotypus, cultura dessicata, (holotype designated here) (BIOTEC Bangkok Herbarium, Pathum Thani, Thailand).

Ex-type culture: MCR 00699 (BCC 83546) (BIOTEC Culture Collection, Pathum Thani, Thailand).

Etymology: ‘satunensis’ referring to the collecting location, Satun Province, southern Thailand, where the fungus was collected.

Sexual morph: Ascomata 1,000–2, 400 × 160–280 µm, semi-immersed, lenticular ascomata, 3–4 locules, dark brown to black, carbonaceous, solitary (Fig. 1).

Three-dimensional synchrotron X-ray tomographic analysis reveals that the fungal tissues growing in the outer exocarp of Nypa palm fruits, enclosing 3–4 locules with flattened base, horizontally arranged under the pseudostroma. Cellular, numerous, persistent, hyaline pseudoparaphyses.

Asci 475–642. 5 × 62.5–80 µm, 8-spored, bitunicate asci, cylindrical, thick-walled, short hook pedunculate, with an ocular chamber. Ascospores 22.5–25 × 5–8.75 µm, unequally two-celled, smooth, dark-brown, and slightly constricted at the septum, thick-walled (Fig. 1).

Habitat and distribution: mangrove forests, Satun Province, southern Thailand.

Asexual morph: Undetermined

Culture characteristics: Ascospores germinated on SCMA after 1–2 days, colonial grown on SPDA attaining 2–3 cm in diameter after 60 days incubation at room temperature (approximately 25–28 °C), dense, circular, irregular and grey (7D1) with orange patches (7C5) in the center, white (7A1) at the edge; dark brown at reverse side. Colour codes in the fungal description follow “Methuen Handbook of Colour” (Kornerup & Wanscher, 1978).

Phylogenetic analyses

The phylogenetic relationships of the Pleosporales, Dothideomycetes were reconstructed using the combined five-gene dataset (SSU, LSU, ITS rDNA, TEF-1α, RPB2), with Lophiostoma macrostomum JCM 13544 and Sigarispora arundinis JCM 13550 as the outgroups (Table 2). The alignment of 74 taxa comprised 5,844 base pairs (1,342 for SSU, 1,358 for LSU, 1,192 for ITS, 968 for TEF-1α and 984 for RPB2). Total 3,825 characters were constant; 1,570 characters were parsimony-informative and 449 variable characters were parsimony-uninformative. Phylogenetic analyses showed that our novel species (in bold) belongs to the Morosphaeriaceae. Although the topology of the BI tree and the exhibited ML tree are comparable, the BI tree is not shown. The phylogenetic trees representing the unique position of other species in the marine habitat were deposited in MycoBank. Significant ML bootstrap values (≥50%) and Bayesian posterior probabilities (≥0.95) are indicated in the phylogenetic tree (Fig. 2).

Morphological features of Helicascus satunensis sp. nov.

Figure 1: Morphological features of Helicascus satunensis sp. nov.

(A) Carbonaceous ascomata on the exocarp of Nypa palm fruit. (B) The 3D visualization of the ascoma by X-ray tomography (arrow). (C) Vertical section through an ascoma. (D) Section through an ascoma using 3D visualization. (E) Dead Nypa palm fruits. (F–G) Obverse and reverse views of cultures grown on SPDA after 60 days. (H–J) Subcylindrical bitunicate asci. (K–M) Ascospores. (N) Pseudoparaphyses (arrow). Scale bars A = 1 mm, C =300 µm, H–J = 100 µm, K–M = 10 µm, N = 20 µm.
The RAxML phylogenetic tree of Helicascus satunensis (BCC 83546, BCC 86189, BCC 86190) resulted from the combined of LSU, SSU, ITS, TEF-1α and RPB2 sequences.

Figure 2: The RAxML phylogenetic tree of Helicascus satunensis (BCC 83546, BCC 86189, BCC 86190) resulted from the combined of LSU, SSU, ITS, TEF-1α and RPB2 sequences.

Lophiostoma macrostomum and Sigarispora arundinis were used as outgroups. Maximum likelihood (BSML, left) equal to or greater than 50% are shown above each branch. Bayesian posterior probabilities (BYPP, right) equal to or greater than 0.95 are shown below each branch. The nodes that are strongly supported by bootstrap proportions (100%) and posterior probabilities (1.00) are shown in a thicker line. Abbreviations: T = ex-type. Novel species is demonstrated in bold.

In the multigene phylogenetic analysis, the Morosphaeriaceae are divided into subclades representing the seven accepted genera including Neohelicascus, Aquihelicascus, Helicascus, Morosphaeria, Clypeoloculus, Microvesuvius, and Aquilomyces. Our fungal strains (BCC 83546, BCC 86189 and BCC 86190) are monophyletic and well placed in the Morosphaeriaceae with robust bootstrap and Bayesian supports. They are phylogenetically distinct from the type species H. kanaloanus and form sister subclades with H. nypae and H. mangrovei (Fig. 2). Within the Helicascus subclade, we compared the base substitutions of our new fungus with the type species H. kanaloanus. The result shows the base substitutions at several sites of SSU (960/969 = 99.0% similarity), LSU (803/853 = 94.1% similarity), ITS rDNA (448/714 = 62.7% similarity), TEF-1 α (872/933 = 93.4% similarity) and RPB2 (793/899 = 88.2% similarity) (Table 3).

Discussion

Taxonomy

Jones et al. (2022) reported 1,900 marine fungi in 769 genera that have evolved for marine life as saprobes, parasites and endophytes. Devadatha et al. (2021) and Zhang et al. (2024) reported that many new taxa have been described from mangrove trees and salt marsh plants. Among these host plants, palms found in mangroves and estuaries, such as Phoenix paludosa, Oncosperma tigillarium, and N. fruticans, harbour a great diversity of fungi (Zhang et al., 2024).

Some of the fungi are found as saprobes on the petioles of N. fruticans: Bacusphaeria nypae, Manglicola guatemaelensis, and Tirisporella baccariana (Jones et al., 1996; Suetrong et al., 2009; Abdel-Wahab et al., 2017). Acuminatispora palmarum, Fasciatispora nypae, Helicascus nypae, Neomorosphaeria mangrovei, Pleurophomopsis nypae, Striatiguttula nypae, and S . phoenicis grow on submerged rachis and petioles of N. fruticans and Ph. paludosa (Hyde et al., 1999; Hyde & Alias, 2000; Loilong et al., 2012; Zhang et al., 2018; Zhang et al., 2019; Zhang et al., 2024). A few fungi, however, were discovered on Nypa fruits: Anthostomella nypae., Fasciatispora spp., and Vaginatispora nypae (Jayasiri et al., 2019; Zhang et al., 2024).

Table 3:
Pairwise DNA comparison of H. satunensis sp. nov. with the Helicascus species.
DNA sequence Number of bases for comparison
(bp)
Helicascus kanaloanus H. nypae H. mangrovei
Base substitutions %
similarity
Base substitutions %
similarity
Base substitutions %
Similarity
SSU rDNA 969 9 99.0 14 98.5 9 99.0
LSU rDNA 853 50 94.1 47 94.5 40 95.3
ITS rDNA 714 266 62.7 ND ND 265 62.9
TEF-1α 933 61 93.4 74 92.0 64 93.1
RPB2 899 106 88.2 115 87.2 107 88.1
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.18341/table-3

Notes:

ND

Not determined

The genus Helicascus is a distinct marine ascomycete characterized by having a pseudostroma composed of host cells enclosed in fungal hyphae, subcylindrical asci, uniseriate, obovoid, dark brown color at maturity, and asymmetrical ascospores (Kohlmeyer, 1969). Recently, three species have been identified in the genus, namely, H. kanaloanus (type species), H. nypae, and H. mangrovei (Kohlmeyer, 1969; Hyde, 1991; Preedanon et al., 2017). We found a new fungus, H. satunensis, that inhabits the brackish waters of Nypa palm fruit in Satun Province, southern Thailand. Helicascus satunensis shares similar ascostromata with H. kanaloanus and H. nypae in having semi-immersed or immersed, carbonaceous, multilocules in the ascostromata arranged under a black pseudoclypeus, while H. mangrovei does not have separate locules in the ascomata (Table 4).

Table 4:
Morphological comparison among species of Helicascus (Kohlmeyer, 1969; Hyde, 1991; Preedanon et al., 2017; Zhang et al., 2024).
Helicascuskanaloanus H. nypae H. mangrovei H. satunensis sp. nov.
Pseudostromata
Size (µm) 600–780 × 1,250–2,750 260–390 × 750–1,500 1,500–1, 750 × 1,500–2,500 1,000–2, 400 × 160–280
Position on substrata Immersed Immersed Semi-immersed Semi-immersed
Locules Multilocules (3–4 loculi) Multilocules (3–4 loculi) Single locule Multilocules (3–4 loculi)
Structure Ampulliform, lenticular, horizontally arranged under a black pseudoclypeus Lenticular, black, carbonaceous Lenticular, flattened, carbonaceous, solitary, a locule covered by a pseudoclypeus Lenticular, black, carbonaceous, solitary
Asci
Size (µm) 200–260 × 15–25 192–280 × 14–20 400–412. 5 × 25–30 475–642. 5 × 62.5–80
Shape Subcylindrical to oblong clavate, persistent, pedunculate, thick-walled Subcylindrical, pedunculate Subcylindrical, pedunculate, thick-walled Cylindrical, thick-walled
Endoascus With an apical apparatus
coiling
With an ocular chamber With an apical apparatus
coiling
Short hook pedunculate with an ocular chamber
Pseudoparaphyses Cellular, numerous, persistent Cellular, numerous, persistent, anastomosing in a gel Cellular, numerous, trabeculate, hyaline Cellular, numerous, persistent, hyaline
Ascospores
Size (µm) 30–55 × 17–25 25–35 × 12 –15 40–45 × 18.5–20 22.5–25 × 5–8.75
Sheath Present in some collection Present Absent Absent
Shape Obovoid, brown, biseriate
one-septate, constricted at the septum, dark-brown at maturity, unequally two-celled
Uniseriate, obovoid, constricted at the septum, brown, sometimes at one or both ends apiculate,
unequally two-celled
Uniseriate, obovoid, unequally two-celled, slightly constricted at the septum, thick-walled
and only one apiculate end,
dark brown at maturity
Constricted at the septum, thick-walled, unequally two-celled, dark brown at maturity
Ornamentation Smooth wall Verrucose wall Smooth wall Smooth wall
Host Dead mangrove wood Nypa fruticans, Phoenix paludosa fronds Dead mangrove wood Nypa fruticans fruit
Asexual morph Undetermined Pleurophomopsis nypae Undetermined Undetermined
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.18341/table-4

Pseudostroma is a unique taxonomic characteristic of the Morosphaeriaceae at the genus level. Zhang et al. (2015) reported that multilocular pseudostroma are important in delineating species of Helicascus-like species. Members of the Morosphaeriaceae develop somatic hyphae into ascostroma, which subsequently form locules that include the genera Helicascus, Neohelicascus, Aquihelicascus, Morosphaeria, Clypeoloculus, and Aquilomyces (Dong et al., 2020). The coiling and stretching mechanism of the basal endoascus with an ocular chamber are regarded as unique types of asci in the genus Helicascus. Our new fungus H. satunensis shares this type of asci with three other species in the genus (Zhang et al., 2015). All species share the same arrangement of cellular pseudoparaphyses. The ascospores of H. satunensis can be distinguished from those of other species because they are smaller (22.5–25 × 5–8.75 µm) than those of H. kanaloanus (30–55 × 17–25 µm), H. nypae (25–35 × 12–15 µm), and H. mangrovei (40–45 × 18.5–20 µm). Germ pores were not observed in H. satunensis, while they appeared at only one end in H. mangrovei (Preedanon et al., 2017). Moreover, the unequal number of H. satunensis 2-cell cones with constriction of ascospores could be a defined taxonomic marker at the species level in the genus Helicascus.

Molecular phylogeny

Phylogenetic analyses of multigene sequences revealed that Helicascus satunensis forms a well-supported clade within the Morosphaeriaceae, Pleosporales, Dothideomycetes. The Morosphaeriaceae family was established by Suetrong et al. (2009) based on morphological features and strong phylogenetic support. Currently, the family comprises eight genera: Aquihelicascus (Dong et al., 2020), Aquilomyces (Knapp et al., 2015), Clypeoloculus (Tanaka et al., 2015), Helicascus (Kohlmeyer, 1969; Dong et al., 2020), Microvesuvius (Fryar, Réblová & Catcheside, 2023), Morosphaeria (Suetrong et al., 2009), Neohelicascus (Dong et al., 2020), and Neomorosphaeria (Zhang et al., 2024).

Members in the Morosphaeriaceae family are found on submerged dead twigs in freshwater and marine environments. The multigene phylogeny comprising freshwater taxa formed sister clades to the marine fungal lineages. Two new freshwater genera, Aquihelicascus and Neohelicascus, were excluded from the genus Helicascus due to morphological and molecular evidence (Dong et al., 2020). Aquihelicascus was established to accommodate one new combination (A. thalassioideus) and two new species (A. songkhlaensis and A. yunnanensis). Neohelicascus was introduced to accommodate one new species (N. submersus) and seven new combinations (N. elaterascus, N. chiangraiensis, N. unilocularis, N. uniseptatus, N. aegyptiacus, N. gallicus, and N. aquaticus) (Dong et al., 2020). The genera Morosphaeria (M. ramunculicola, M. muthupetensis, M. velatispora) (Suetrong et al., 2009; Devadatha et al., 2018), Neomorosphaeria (Zhang et al., 2024), and Helicascus (H. kanaloanus, H. nypae, H. mangrovei) are predominant saprobic on decaying mangroves and marine substrata, while only Aquilomyces patris is a root endophyte of white poplar (Fryar, Réblová & Catcheside, 2023).

The multigene phylogeny in the present study showed that our new fungus H. satunensis forms a distinct lineage within the genus Helicascus with robust statistical support (100% ML bootstrap and 1.00 Bayesian posterior probability). The DNA sequences of H. satunensis differ from those of H. kanaloanus and other species in terms of the number of nucleotide base substitutions in all the DNA regions, which indicates that these species are different. In conclusion, with its unique morphological and multigene phylogeny, we introduce H. satunensis as a novel mangrove fungus.

Supplemental Information

Multigene DNA sequence alignment

DOI: 10.7717/peerj.18341/supp-1

SSU sequences for GenBank submission

DOI: 10.7717/peerj.18341/supp-2

LSU sequences for GenBank submission

DOI: 10.7717/peerj.18341/supp-3

ITS sequences for GenBank submission

DOI: 10.7717/peerj.18341/supp-4

TEF sequences for GenBank submission

DOI: 10.7717/peerj.18341/supp-5

RPB2 sequences for GenBank submission

DOI: 10.7717/peerj.18341/supp-6