Oh yeah, now I remember this one, a goody: Piwowar, H. A., & Vision, T. J. (2013). Data reuse and the open data citation advantage. PeerJ, 1, e175. https://t.co/RdE8FuN1rJ
@giladfeldman Example 2 of 'asking about the numbers' (but obv this is less about individual altruism): the citation advantage to papers with open data (there is a small lit on this issue, not just this paper): https://t.co/Boh56mtskJ
@nicolekeithphd I mean the request is rude, no doubt, but why not have open data? It is beneficial to the original authors because it increases citations. It benefits the whole community by providing rich data to be used by all
https://t.co/30HSE3xuhy
FYI, three earlier studies also showing that open data increases article citations.
1. Heather Piwowar and Todd Vision, 2013,
https://t.co/mDSjqH66s2
2. Giovanni Colavizza et al., 2019,
https://t.co/zXMHWYuUY1
3. Garret Christensen et al., 2019,
https://t.co/BBcl0le2GL
Get a 20-60% citation boost in citations to your publications by sharing on the supporting data the open repository at https://t.co/1MBLZIIUsE. #opendata
https://t.co/q7mniZXMcb
Studien, die Daten in einem öffentlichen Repository zur Verfügung stellen, erhalten mehr Zitate als andere Studien. So Heather A. Piwowar und Todd J. Vision in ihrem Artikel "Data reuse and the open data citation advantage": https://t.co/v0TlNEOG2Z #econ4openscience https://t.co/GlDaV1dZw4
@andreasinica @grace_baynes Also see Heather Piwowar (@researchremix) and Todd Vision (@tjvision), Data reuse and the open data citation advantage, PeerJ, October 1, 2013.
https://t.co/mDSjqH66s2
@srharacha @tsuyomiyakawa totally agree. I studied it in microarray data, found authors mostly wrong, they don't self reuse much https://t.co/68zFH1hKAn
#Peerj #PeerReview "Data reuse and the open data citation advantage" #BioInformatics #Genomics #BioInfo #BioInformatique #Data #OpenData #citation (Intérêt du partage d'information) ... https://t.co/874XlF8WnB