All reviews of published articles are made public. This includes manuscript files, peer review comments, author rebuttals and revised materials. Note: This was optional for articles submitted before 13 February 2023.
Peer reviewers are encouraged (but not required) to provide their names to the authors when submitting their peer review. If they agree to provide their name, then their personal profile page will reflect a public acknowledgment that they performed a review (even if the article is rejected). If the article is accepted, then reviewers who provided their name will be associated with the article itself.
The authors have addressed all of the reviewers' comments and the manuscript is ready for publication.
[# PeerJ Staff Note - this decision was reviewed and approved by Mike Climstein, a PeerJ Section Editor covering this Section #]
No comment
No comment
No comment
The authors did a great job in reviewing the manuscript as requested. I have no further comments. Congratulations on a very interesting study. All the best.
no comment
no comment
no comment
no comment
The reviewers find merit in the manuscript. However, some specific points need further clarification, such as the main purpose, and more information is needed about methods and procedures to allow replication. Please, address each comment point by point and provide a detailed response.
**PeerJ Staff Note:** Please ensure that all review, editorial, and staff comments are addressed in a response letter and that any edits or clarifications mentioned in the letter are also inserted into the revised manuscript where appropriate.
Please see the pdf attached.
Please see the pdf attached.
Please see the pdf attached.
Please see the pdf attached.
No comment.
No comment.
No comment.
Dear authors,
Very nice paper about the obtaining more information the neuromuscular and metabolic qualities of Repeat Power Ability. Throughout the entire manuscript, there is sufficient scientific evidence that supports the claims and the findings of the authors. In this way, the authors should be congratulated for the well-written manuscript and the well-conducted research.
However, there are some specific changes and suggestions that should be made to improve the quality of the paper.
Introduction:
- Pg8Ln58 - This sentence needs a reference.
- What were the hypotheses of the study? Insert this information in the introduction section
after the objective.
Materials & Methods
Participants
- What were the inclusion and exclusion criteria for participants. Please include this information.
Procedures
- Was any familiarization carried out with the participants? If yes, enter this information. If no familiarization was carried out, the results obtained in the study may have been compromised, since the improvements found may be due to the fact that the participants improved their technical level in each exercise/test.
- Were the tests performed at the same time in all four sessions? Please include this information.
Coutermovement Jump
- Enter the ICC and CV percentage
- Pg12Ln168 - Enter the name of the force platform, model, country and city.
Speed
- Enter the ICC and CV percentage
- In the warm-up, how did the authors control the intensity of 70, 80 and 90% in the sprints? Enter this information.
Yoyo Intermittent Recovery Test 2
- Enter the ICC and CV percentage
Statistical Analysis
- Authors in the statistical analysis section must mention the level of significance used.
- Pg17Ln278 - Enter the name of the model, country and city of the software
Results
- Authors must place a caption in tables 1, 2 and 3 describing the meaning of the acronyms.
- The authors refer in the results to a table 4 that is not included in the annexes. Rectify this
situation.
- The authors in the annexes have a table 3 that they never refer to throughout the document.
Please rectify
Discussion
- The first paragraph of the discussion should be a reminder of the objective of the study. Please include this information.
- Pg21Ln381 - This sentence needs a reference.
- It would be interesting to place a paragraph after the limitations mentioning future lines of investigation, in order to enrich the study.
Best regards
All text and materials provided via this peer-review history page are made available under a Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.