Visitors   Views   Downloads
Note that a Preprint of this article also exists, first published November 24, 2015.


Mycotoxin regulation mechanisms leading to accumulation of toxins in the plant, and consequently in grains used for human and animal consumption, are still partially unknown. Nutrients and specific molecules are supposed to play a key inducing role in activating toxin pathways in planta. Fusarium graminearum Schwabe [teleomorph Gibberella zeae (Schwein.) Petch], Fusarium culmorum (WG Smith) Sacc. and Fusarium poae (Peck) Wollenw. are the main species associated with trichothecene type B (TB) production in Fusarium Head Blight (FHB) in wheat in different agricultural areas in the world. The most important Fusarium TB are deoxynivalenol (DON), the amount of which in food and feed is controlled in many countries, 3-acetylated DON (3ADON), 15-acetylated DON (15ADON), Nivalenol (NIV) and Fusarenon X (FUSX). F. graminearum and F. culmorum can also produce Zearalenone (ZEA), a toxin which is legislatively regulated in food and feed due to its estrogenic effect on humans and animals. Each Fusarium strain is able to produce some of these toxins depending on the set of genes present in the genome (Proctor et al., 2009) and the triggering factors leading to toxin production. Because toxigenic risk in food depends on multiple factors including the type of fungal population colonizing the plant (and its toxigenic potential), much effort has been devoted to studying the epidemiology of different chemotypes worldwide (Pasquali & Migheli, 2014), using genetic means to discriminate populations that are more or less toxigenic (Von der Ohe et al., 2011). Chemical determination of chemotypes is still an important approach to confirm genetic analysis based on gene polymorphisms (Desjardins, 2008); therefore, liquid media able to stimulate toxin production have been widely employed for determining the toxin potential of isolates.

Mechanisms of toxin induction in F. graminearum include sugar types (Jiao, Kawakami & Nakajima, 2008), pH effects (Gardiner, Kazan & Manners, 2009; Merhej et al., 2010), inorganic compounds (Tsuyuki et al., 2011; Pinson-Gadais et al., 2008), oxidative stress (Ponts et al., 2007), fungicides (Magan et al., 2002), light (Kim, Son & Lee, 2014), and water activity levels (Llorens et al., 2004; Schmidt-Heydt et al., 2011) and have also been linked to chemotype diversity (Ponts et al., 2009). F. graminearum boosts toxin production when grown in a medium with agmatine and other putrescines to levels that are comparable to the high contaminations observed in planta (Gardiner et al., 2009). Hypotheses on the role of polyamines in planta as a cue for the production of trichothecene mycotoxins by F. graminearum during the FHB disease have been formulated (Gardiner et al., 2010) and the use of inhibitors of polyamine transport in the fungal cells have been proposed as a novel approach to limit toxin contamination in grains (Crespo-Sempere et al., 2015). Studying the effect of agmatine on other species can elucidate whether this mechanism is also effective in other Fusarium species that are often found to coexist in agricultural settings (Giraud et al., 2010), directly contributing to toxin accumulation (Beyer et al., 2014). Because the colonization of the plant by the fungus and the resulting production of toxins are the outcomes of the interaction of the environment, the fungus and the plant, here we focused on how fungal diversity is affected by a putative plant-derived inducer of toxin production. We therefore tested the level of toxin induction in relation to fungal diversity in 3 Fusarium species when confronted with 2 standardized media which are mild and strong inducers of toxin synthesis.

Table 1:
Strain identification code, species, genetic chemotype, year of isolation, geographical origin, strain collection where the strain is deposited.
Strain identification code Species Genetic chemotype Year of isolation Geographical origin Strain collectiona
13-01 F. culmorum 3ADON 2008 (Hoscheid) Luxembourg LuxMCC
233 F. culmorum NIV 2007 (Reisdorf) Luxembourg LuxMCC
189 F. culmorum 3ADON 2007 (Reisdorf) Luxembourg LuxMCC
01-02 F. culmorum NIV 2008 (Kehlen) Luxembourg LuxMCC
557 F. culmorum 3ADON 2007 (Reuler) Luxembourg LuxMCC
708 F. culmorum NIV 2007 (Christnach) Luxembourg LuxMCC
MUCL555 F. culmorum NIV 1952 Unknown MUCL
MUCL15500 F. culmorum NIV 1946 Netherlands MUCL
MUCL11946 F. graminearum 3ADON 1969 Belgium MUCL
NRRL37099 F. graminearum 3ADON 1994 (Manitoba) Canada NRRL
MUCL42825 F. graminearum NIV 2000 Belgium MUCL
16-09 F. graminearum NIV 2008 (Troisvierges) Luxembourg LuxMCC
734 F. graminearum 15ADON 2007 (Christnach) Luxembourg LuxMCC
11-24 F. graminearum 15ADON 2008 (Echternach) Luxembourg LuxMCC
UMW00-706 F. graminearum 15ADON >2000 USA Courtesy of L. Gale
80 F. poae 2007 (Nothum) Luxembourg LuxMCC
491 F. poae 2007 (Nothum) Luxembourg LuxMCC
57B F. poae 2007 (Kayl) Luxembourg LuxMCC
504A F. poae 2007 (Kayl) Luxembourg LuxMCC
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.1672/table-1


LuxMCC, Luxembourg Microbial Culture Collection (LUX); MUCL, Mycothèque de l‘Universite Catholique de Louvain (BEL); NRRL, Agricultural Research Service culture collection (USA).

Therefore, the aims of the work were to evaluate the toxigenic potential in vitro of a set of isolates and to analyse the effect of agmatine as toxin-inducing compounds across species and chemotypes.

Material and Methods

Isolates and growth conditions

Isolates used in this study are listed in Table 1. As determined in our laboratory, they have a different geographic origin and belong to different genetic chemotypes (Pasquali et al., 2011). Strains are conserved in the Luxembourg Microbial Culture Collection accessible at (Piec et al., 2016). All isolates were grown on V8 (V8 juice 20%, CaCO3 2 g, 18 g agar, H2O to 1 L) plates for 4 days at 20 °C in the dark. The growing edge of the mycelium was divided into 2 mm squares and one square each was used to inoculate 10 ml media in sterile glass tubes. The assay was carried out with three completely independent biological replicates.

In order to analyse toxin induction, 2 media were used and compared. The first medium (J), from Jiao, Kawakami & Nakajima (2008) (containing 1 g K2HPO4, 0.5 g KCl, 0.5 g MgSO4⋅7H2O, 2 g L-glutamic acid, 10 mg FeSO4⋅7H2O, 10 g sucrose in a litre of solution) was compared to a medium (G) from Gardiner et al. (2009), containing (30 g sucrose, 1.15 g Agmatine, 1 g KH2PO4, 0.5 g MgSO4⋅7H2O, 0.5 g KCl, 10 mg FeSO4⋅7H2O in a litre solution). The two media have approximately the same C/N ratio, which is known to play a role in toxin regulation (Hestbjerg et al., 2002) but differ for the source of nitrogen and the amount of carbon source. Tubes were shaken at 180 rpm in the dark for 10 d. Fungal biomass was then filtered and weighted with a precision balance after drying using a freeze drier for 48 h, and the remaining media were kept for further toxin extraction.

Chemical analysis

The medium was filtered through a 0.2 µm GHP membrane filter (PAL, MI, USA) and diluted in methanol (extract/methanol, 9/1, V/V) in order to be in the appropriate solvent ratio for chromatographic analysis. The quantification of all mycotoxins except 3-ADON and 15-ADON was performed by LC coupled to tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS, Dionex Ultimate 3000, AB/Sciex API 3200, Foster City, CA, USA) in multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) in positive/negative switching mode. The LC analytical column was an Agilent Zorbax Eclipse Plus C18 (2.1 ×150 mm, 3.5 µm) with a mobile phase consisting of methanol and water containing 2.5 mM of ammonium acetate in a linear gradient. The specific analysis of 3-ADON and 15-ADON was achieved using a second LC-MS/MS method on an Agilent 1260 LC coupled to an AB/Sciex 4500 QTrap mass spectrometer. The column was an Agilent Poroshell 120 EC-C18 (2.1 × 150 mm, 2.7 µm) and the eluents were the same as for the first method. All mycotoxins were quantified by external calibration based on pure standards (Biopure, Tulln, AT and Sigma-Aldrich, Schnelldorf, Germany). The detection and quantification limits were 1.5 ng/ml of liquid culture for all toxins. The analyses were done in two technical replicates and the average value was considered for each biological replicate.

Statistical analysis

All data were analysed using PASW version 19 and SigmaPlot version 12.5. Overall TB production was calculated summing up all trichothecenes type B measured (DON, 3ADON, 15ADON, NIV, FUS-X). Mass-corrected toxin concentrations were calculated and used for determining the effect of nitrogen source on toxin boosting. The Mann–Whitney Rank Sum test was used to verify the effect of the medium on masses and the effect of nitrogen source in the medium on mass-corrected summed trichothecene type B values. The Kruskal–Wallis One-Way Analysis of Variance on Ranks was used to verify the effect of the medium on the average ratio of TB production in the two media for each strain classified either as species or as chemotypes. Significant differences are considered when p < 0.05.

Results and Discussion

Growth (dry mass) and toxin production using a multimethod assay including DON, 3ADON, 15ADON, NIV, FUS-X, ZEA, T2, HT2 were measured on a set of 19 strains (Table 1) when grown in the two media. Mycelium growth (estimated as dry mass) was influenced by the medium increasing, as expected, in the high containing saccharose medium (p < 0.001). The mass of the strains in glutamic acid medium ranged from 3.4 mg to 19.6 mg while in the agmatine/saccharose-rich medium, masses ranged from 8.9 to 36.1 mg. Growth results are comparable with results obtained by Jiao, Kawakami & Nakajima (2008) for the medium with glutamic acid. We observed that FG and FC had a similar range of growth in each medium while FP differed significantly in growth compared to the other two species (p > 0.05). No effect of the chemotype (p = 0.328) could be identified. In all three species there was nonetheless a significant growth effect caused by the medium being the agmatine/high saccharose medium, a booster of mass growth (p > 0.001 for all the three comparisons, Fig. 1). The overall increase in dry mass caused by the agmatine medium can be attributed to the higher amount of saccharose in the medium, with carbon being the main constituent of fungal biomass (Newell & Statzell-Tallman, 1982). To evaluate toxin production, we therefore normalized the toxin produced by the dry mass per ml.

Dry mycelium mass measured in the two media in the three species.

Figure 1: Dry mycelium mass measured in the two media in the three species.

Mass in mg of dried mycelium grown 10 days in the two media (Gardiner medium containing agmatine; Jiao medium containing glutamic acid). Asterisks indicate significant differences using Mann–Whitney rank test (p < 0.05).

The two sources of nitrogen had an overall significant effect on trichothecene type B mass-corrected production across the three species (p = 0.003). The agmatine medium induced higher TB production in 13 out of 19 strains. Six isolates produced average TB toxins in ng/ml corrected by their mass in mg above 150 ng/ml/mg (F. culmorum 233, 13-01; F. graminearum 734, 37099 and MUCL42825 and F. poae 80). All these isolates increased their production in the medium containing agmatine with a boosting factor ranging between 192X of 13-01 to 15X of isolate 80. Four isolates (01-02, 557. MUCL15500, UMW00706) demonstrated the opposite behaviour when grown in the medium containing agmatine (Fig. 2).

Toxins ratio comparing the two media.

Figure 2: Toxins ratio comparing the two media.

Log 10 transformed average ratio of TB production in agmatine vs glutamic acid medium. Values are the sum of all trichothecene type B detected (DON, 3ADON, 15ADON, NIV, FUSX). In red, isolates that have higher amount of TB in the glutamic acid medium while in blue those that have higher amount in the agmatine medium.

We could also confirm that strains with a determined genetic chemotype can also produce a minor amount of the other acetylated and non-acetylated trichothecenes (De Kuppler et al., 2011). Nonetheless, there was a good correspondence between the genetic chemotype and the major toxin type produced (Table S1).

By analysing the average ratio of toxin production in the isolates according to their species or their chemotype, we could not detect a clear effect of any of the two categories. In fact, the response of toxin production to the two media was not significantly affected by the species (p = 0.552) nor by the chemotype (p = 0.578). A previous hypothesis suggesting differences at the chemotype level on toxin regulation (Ponts et al., 2009) may have been biased by the limited number of strains used.

ZEA production, in the only consistent producer of the lot (F. culmorum 01-02), doubled in the agmatine medium suggesting that the mechanism boosting TB production also potentially affects ZEA production. This would imply that the agmatine regulation of ZEA and of the trichothecene cluster is common, despite gene expression data from the available microarray studies not showing consistent concordant patterns (Sieber et al., 2014). A larger set of isolates producing ZEA is nonetheless needed to verify this hypothesis.

In our analysis, we also included two food and feed monitored trichothecene type A (TA) toxins but no isolates of F. poae produced any detectable amount of T2 and HT-2. As the biosynthesis of TAs follows a similar pathway (Kimura et al., 2007), we can expect similar effects due to agmatine on TA. However, we could not confirm this with the isolates used in our study.


The effect of 2 different media containing agmatine or glutamic acid on toxin induction and growth in a total of nineteen strains belonging to the F. graminearum (n = 7), F. culmorum (n = 8) and F. poae (n = 4) species was evaluated. With our species-comparative study, we confirmed that on average the mechanism of triggering toxin production by agmatine is confirmed in the 3 species but that the mechanism is also significantly influenced by strain diversity (Pasquali et al., 2015). The identification of isolates that do not respond to agmatine may help decipher the pathways leading to specific agmatine regulation in the fungus. Despite these data being obtained by culturing the fungus in vitro, they can contribute to explaining the partial diversity of toxin contamination observed in planta: indeed, on average, different cultivars accumulate different levels of DON (Ji et al., 2015). Hypotheses on the effect of the plant oxidative status (Waśkiewicz et al., 2014) and of polyamine concentration on toxin synthesis in planta have been formulated (Gardiner et al., 2010). Here we showed that strain diversity can also account for a factor 1000X in the level of toxin accumulation. Exploring the diversity of interactions between strains and toxin triggering compounds such as polyamines (Valdes-Santiago et al., 2012) is fundamental to identifying general inhibitors of TB accumulation in the plant.

Supplemental Information

Average values with standard deviation of FusarenonX, Nivalenol, 3 Acetylated deoxynivalenol, 15 Acetylated deoxynivalenol, Deoxynivalenol and Zearalenone measured for each strain

Toxin values are expressed in ng of toxin per ml of liquid medium per mg of mycelium In yellow the cases where major toxin produced did not corresponded to the genetic chemotyping. In blue, red and green the major toxin produced corresponding to the genetic chemotyping prediction.

DOI: 10.7717/peerj.1672/supp-1

Raw data

Toxins values and mass values recorded for each biological replicates used in this study.

DOI: 10.7717/peerj.1672/supp-2