Review History


All reviews of published articles are made public. This includes manuscript files, peer review comments, author rebuttals and revised materials. Note: This was optional for articles submitted before 13 February 2023.

Peer reviewers are encouraged (but not required) to provide their names to the authors when submitting their peer review. If they agree to provide their name, then their personal profile page will reflect a public acknowledgment that they performed a review (even if the article is rejected). If the article is accepted, then reviewers who provided their name will be associated with the article itself.

View examples of open peer review.

Summary

  • The initial submission of this article was received on July 19th, 2023 and was peer-reviewed by 3 reviewers and the Academic Editor.
  • The Academic Editor made their initial decision on August 6th, 2023.
  • The first revision was submitted on August 23rd, 2023 and was reviewed by 3 reviewers and the Academic Editor.
  • The article was Accepted by the Academic Editor on August 29th, 2023.

Version 0.2 (accepted)

· Aug 29, 2023 · Academic Editor

Accept

it is a good revision, and could be accepted.

[# PeerJ Staff Note - this decision was reviewed and approved by Jafri Abdullah, a PeerJ Section Editor covering this Section #]

Reviewer 1 ·

Basic reporting

The revised manuscript significantly improves the overall coherence and clarity of the content, rendering it more comprehensible and reader-friendly. I wholeheartedly appreciate the authors for their dedication and meticulousness in implementing the revisions as per my recommendations. Thanks to the exceptional efforts of the authors, I strongly recommend the acceptance of this manuscript.

Experimental design

/

Validity of the findings

/

Additional comments

/

Reviewer 2 ·

Basic reporting

None

Experimental design

None

Validity of the findings

None

Additional comments

None

Reviewer 3 ·

Basic reporting

no comment

Experimental design

no comment

Validity of the findings

no comment

Additional comments

no comment

Version 0.1 (original submission)

· Aug 6, 2023 · Academic Editor

Major Revisions

Please follow the reviewer's comments.

**PeerJ Staff Note:** Please ensure that all review and editorial comments are addressed in a response letter and any edits or clarifications mentioned in the letter are also inserted into the revised manuscript where appropriate.

**Language Note:** The review process has identified that the English language must be improved. PeerJ can provide language editing services - please contact us at copyediting@peerj.com for pricing (be sure to provide your manuscript number and title). Alternatively, you should make your own arrangements to improve the language quality and provide details in your response letter. – PeerJ Staff

Reviewer 1 ·

Basic reporting

This paper aims to conduct a comprehensive review of digital Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Insomnia (dCBT-I) and its effectiveness in alleviating both insomnia and depression. The research is of utmost importance, shedding light on a promising therapeutic approach for addressing these prevalent and interconnected conditions.

Spelling out Abbreviations:
In the Abstract, it is essential to spell out all abbreviations upon their first appearance. For instance, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Insomnia (CBT-I) should be spelled out in its first mention.


Rigorous Editing and Language Correction:
The English language used in the paper should be subjected to rigorous editing and correction. This measure ensures that the text adheres to proper grammatical rules, is free from spelling errors, and maintains consistent terminology throughout. Clarity and accuracy in the language will enhance the paper's readability and overall quality.

Experimental design

Inclusion of Country Information:
The second paragraph of the results should not only describe the countries where the study was conducted but also incorporate this information in Table 1. By doing so, readers can readily discern the geographical scope of the research, which may provide additional context and potential regional variations in the findings.

Validity of the findings

Enhancing the Description of Results:
The Abstract's section on results is currently quite succinct. It should be expanded to provide a more detailed and informative overview of the findings. The methods employed in the study to derive the results include Standardized Mean Difference (SMD) with corresponding 95% Confidence Intervals (CI). For a comprehensive understanding, the results should be supplemented with the respective 95% CI and P-value, offering readers a clearer insight into the statistical significance and precision of the outcomes.

Additional comments

In conclusion, the paper's objective of reviewing the effectiveness of dCBT-I in alleviating insomnia and depression holds great significance in the field of mental health. However, to ensure the paper's excellence, attention should be given to spelling out abbreviations, providing more detailed results with relevant statistical measures, incorporating country information in Table 1, and thoroughly editing and correcting the English language used throughout the manuscript. By addressing these aspects, the paper will make a valuable contribution to the existing literature on the subject and aid in further research and therapeutic advancements in this area.

Reviewer 2 ·

Basic reporting

The present study delves into the effectiveness of Digital Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Insomnia (dCBT-I) in patients suffering from insomnia and comorbid depression. By conducting a meticulous systematic review and meta-analysis, the authors present evidence that establishes dCBT-I as a promising treatment option for depression in the country. However, to ensure the credibility of the findings, several critical points should be addressed.

*Adverse reactions to digital cognitive behavioral therapy:
explore and elaborate on potential adverse reactions associated with dCBT-I. addressing the safety profile is crucial for evaluating its feasibility and acceptability as a treatment option. a thorough examination of adverse events and their implications would enhance the study's robustness.

*Subgroup analysis: patient compliance:
include a subgroup analysis, focusing on patient compliance, to understand dCBT-I's efficacy comprehensively. investigating the correlation between treatment adherence and observed outcomes would provide valuable insights into the therapy's real-world impact and identify potential factors influencing its success.

*Avoiding duplication:
clarify any similarities with a previously published work (DOI: 10.1038/s41746-023-00800-3). ensure the current study offers novel contributions without replicating existing research. properly cite any overlap or rewrite to distinguish the present study's originality.

*Abbreviations and acronyms:
explicitly define all abbreviations and acronyms used throughout the manuscript when they appear for the first time. this practice will eliminate ambiguity and aid readers in grasping the concepts and findings without confusion.

*Improving the quality of English writing:
the manuscript requires substantial improvement in english language proficiency. consider seeking assistance from fluent English speakers or professional language editors to refine the writing quality and ensure adherence to academic conventions. enhancing grammar, syntax, and vocabulary will improve the manuscript's overall readability and impact.

Experimental design

None

Validity of the findings

None

Additional comments

None

Reviewer 3 ·

Basic reporting

The authors' analysis of dCBT-I (digital cognitive-behavioral therapy for insomnia) reveals its effective effects in alleviating both insomnia and depression, presenting it as a promising option for depression treatment.The manuscript's English language quality is notably poor, hindering comprehension at various points. To enhance both the scientific merit and language clarity, it is advisable to have the manuscript carefully reviewed by a fluent English speaker or a professional language editing service.
Enhancements in figure font sizes and clarity are essential for better presentation and understanding of the visual data.

Experimental design

The study's purpose should be precisely stated to reflect its specific objectives and scope accurately.

Validity of the findings

The discussion section should prioritize highlighting the novelty of the work and provide a more extensive explanation of the clinical applicability of the findings to offer deeper insights.

Additional comments

No additional comments.

All text and materials provided via this peer-review history page are made available under a Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.