Review History


All reviews of published articles are made public. This includes manuscript files, peer review comments, author rebuttals and revised materials. Note: This was optional for articles submitted before 13 February 2023.

Peer reviewers are encouraged (but not required) to provide their names to the authors when submitting their peer review. If they agree to provide their name, then their personal profile page will reflect a public acknowledgment that they performed a review (even if the article is rejected). If the article is accepted, then reviewers who provided their name will be associated with the article itself.

View examples of open peer review.

Summary

  • The initial submission of this article was received on April 26th, 2023 and was peer-reviewed by 2 reviewers and the Academic Editor.
  • The Academic Editor made their initial decision on May 4th, 2023.
  • The first revision was submitted on May 19th, 2023 and was reviewed by 2 reviewers and the Academic Editor.
  • A further revision was submitted on June 1st, 2023 and was reviewed by 1 reviewer and the Academic Editor.
  • The article was Accepted by the Academic Editor on June 1st, 2023.

Version 0.3 (accepted)

· Jun 1, 2023 · Academic Editor

Accept

In my opinion, this manuscript has been revised with attention to the reviewers' comments and can now be published.

[# PeerJ Staff Note - this decision was reviewed and approved by Jafri Abdullah, a PeerJ Section Editor covering this Section #]

Reviewer 1 ·

Basic reporting

ok.

Experimental design

ok.

Validity of the findings

ok.

Additional comments

Dear Editor,
All suggestions have been done well.
Manuscription is clear.
It is acceptable.
Thank you.

Best Reagrds.

Version 0.2

· May 22, 2023 · Academic Editor

Minor Revisions

Please consider all reviewers' comments in the revised version.

[# PeerJ Staff Note: It is PeerJ policy that additional references suggested during the peer-review process should only be included if the authors are in agreement that they are relevant and useful #]

Reviewer 1 ·

Basic reporting

...

Experimental design

...

Validity of the findings

...

Additional comments

Manuscript title: Diet and physical activity and metabolic disorders in patients with schizophrenia and bipolar affective disorder in the Polish population
Some other comments to consider:
1.This suggestion has been done well. Thank you.
2. This suggestion has not been done.
I think the introduction and discussion sections of the following articles are related to your article. The following articles can be useful and contribute to your article. You may cite below important articles.
-Kucukkubas N.; Korkusuz F. What happens to bone mineral density, strength and body composition of ex-elite female volleyball players: A cross sectional study. Science & Sports, 2019, 34.4: e259-e269.
-Kucukkubas, N., & Korkusuz, F. Dual X-ray Absorbtiometry Can Predict Total and Regional Body Fat Percentage: A Comparative Study With Skinfold Thickness and Body Mass Index For Adult Women. PROGRESS IN NUTRITION, 2020:22(3);1-12.
3. This suggestion has been done well. Thank you.
4. This suggestion has been done well. Thank you.
5. This suggestion has been done well. Thank you.
6. This suggestion has been done well. Thank you.
Sincerely.

·

Basic reporting

Dear Editor,
I really appreciate the opportunity to review the manuscript peerj-reviewing-84836-v1 entitled:
"Diet and physical activity and metabolic disorders in patients with schizophrenia and bipolar affective disorder in the Polish population"

Experimental design

No issues to highlight

Validity of the findings

The paper is very interesting and well-written, methodologically unexceptionable, and the new implementations provide a valid contribution to the work. Every requested correction has been done, and the manuscript is now suitable for publication

Version 0.1 (original submission)

· May 4, 2023 · Academic Editor

Minor Revisions

I have now received the reviewers' comments on your manuscript. They have suggested some minor revisions to your manuscript. Therefore, I invite you to respond to the reviewers' comments and revise your manuscript.

Reviewer 1 has suggested that you cite specific references. You are welcome to add it/them if you believe they are relevant. However, you are not required to include these citations, and if you do not include them, this will not influence my decision.

[# PeerJ Staff Note: It is PeerJ policy that additional references suggested during the peer-review process should only be included if the authors are in agreement that they are relevant and useful #]

Reviewer 1 ·

Basic reporting

the article meets your standards,

Experimental design

the article meets your standards,

Validity of the findings

the article meets your standards,

Additional comments

Manuscript title: Diet and physical activity and metabolic disorders in patients with schizophrenia and bipolar affective disorder in the Polish population
This is important clinical study.
Some other comments to consider:
1.Abstract was written correctly.
2. There is not sufficient information abot physical activity. Discuss this important issues and cite below important articles.
- Kucukkubas N.; KORKUSUZ F. What happens to bone mineral density, strength and body composition of ex-elite female volleyball players: A cross sectional study. Science & Sports, 2019, 34.4: e259-e269.
-Küçükkubaş Nigar. "Vücut Kompozisyonunun Belirlenmesi ve Çok Bileşenli Modeller." Başkent Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi-BÜSBİD 6.1 (2021).
-Kucukkubas, N., & KORKUSUZ, F. Dual X-ray Absorbtiometry Can Predict Total and Regional Body Fat Percentage: A Comparative Study With Skinfold Thickness and Body Mass Index For Adult Women. PROGRESS IN NUTRITION, 2020:22(3);1-12.
-Demir, A. , Akın, M. & Küçükkubaş, N. (2019). Comparison of dynamic balance properties of hypermobility in boys . International Journal of Sport Exercise and Training Sciences - IJSETS , 5 (1) , 15-22 . DOI: 10.18826/useeabd.510426
-Kucukkubaş, N. , Gunay, A. , Lokluoglu, B. & Kakil, B. (2019). Relationship Between Body Composition, Vertical Jump, 30 M Sprint, Static Strength and Anaerobic Power for Athletes . International Journal of Sport Exercise and Training Sciences - IJSETS , 5 (2) , 68-78 .
- Yaprak, Y.& Küçükkubaş, N. (2020). Gender-related differences on physical fitness parameters after core training exercises: A comparative study. Progress in Nutrition, 22(3), e2020028-e2020028.
Smoking, weight, life styles, obesity, adipokines dysregulation, and inflammation are all recognized pathophysiologic mechanisms for Schizophrenia. Discuss this important issues.
3.The discussion chapter is not well written and looked deeply in to the literature and cited to international research. In overall the references list is rather old, latest from 2018 (rather less), consider updating?
4.It may be important that you should cite and discuss below articles;
- Kucukkubas N.; KORKUSUZ F. What happens to bone mineral density, strength and body composition of ex-elite female volleyball players: A cross sectional study. Science & Sports, 2019, 34.4: e259-e269.
-Küçükkubaş Nigar. "Vücut Kompozisyonunun Belirlenmesi ve Çok Bileşenli Modeller." Başkent Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi-BÜSBİD 6.1 (2021).
-Kucukkubas, N., & KORKUSUZ, F. Dual X-ray Absorbtiometry Can Predict Total and Regional Body Fat Percentage: A Comparative Study With Skinfold Thickness and Body Mass Index For Adult Women. PROGRESS IN NUTRITION, 2020:22(3);1-12.
-Demir, A. , Akın, M. & Küçükkubaş, N. (2019). Comparison of dynamic balance properties of hypermobility in boys . International Journal of Sport Exercise and Training Sciences - IJSETS , 5 (1) , 15-22 . DOI: 10.18826/useeabd.510426
-Kucukkubaş, N. , Gunay, A. , Lokluoglu, B. & Kakil, B. (2019). Relationship Between Body Composition, Vertical Jump, 30 M Sprint, Static Strength and Anaerobic Power for Athletes . International Journal of Sport Exercise and Training Sciences - IJSETS , 5 (2) , 68-78 .
- Yaprak, Y.& Küçükkubaş, N. (2020). Gender-related differences on physical fitness parameters after core training exercises: A comparative study. Progress in Nutrition, 22(3), e2020028-e2020028.
-Sahpolat M, Ayar D, Ari M, Karaman MA. Elevated Monocyte to High-density Lipoprotein Ratios as an Inflammation Markers for Schizophrenia Patients. Clin Psychopharmacol Neurosci. 2021;19(1):112-116.
- Sahpolat, M, & Ari, M. (2021). Higher prevalence of metabolic syndrome and related factors in patients with first-episode psychosis and schizophrenia: a cross-sectional study in Turkey. Nordic Journal of Psychiatry, 75(1), 73-78.
- Sahpolat M, Ari M, Kokacya MH. Plasma Apelin, Visfatin and Resistin Levels in Patients with First Episode Psychosis and Chronic Schizophrenia. Clin Psychopharmacol Neurosci. 2020;18(1):109-115.
5.The study has a lot of limitations. Authors have written rather little about it. You should write more limitations of this study.
6. The authıors must arrange the references which have not been arranged according to journal guideliness. There is serious mistakes.
Sincerely.

Annotated reviews are not available for download in order to protect the identity of reviewers who chose to remain anonymous.

·

Basic reporting

Dear Editor,
I really appreciate the opportunity to review the manuscript entitled:
"Diet and physical activity and metabolic disorders in patients with schizophrenia and bipolar affective disorder in the Polish population"

I commend the authors for describing this critical and timely issue. The paper is interesting and well-written; however, I would like to highlight some issues that merit revision:

Experimental design

The article is innovative and particularly interesting

Validity of the findings

it does not appear to be well delineated in the manuscript in what the impact of olanzapine might be; as widely highlighted in the literature, while its absolute clinical therapeutic validity, its action on weight and consequently on the metabolic syndrome are worthy of mention in the manuscript. I beg the authors to emphasize this in the text or if the data is not available to add it in the limitations

All text and materials provided via this peer-review history page are made available under a Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.