All reviews of published articles are made public. This includes manuscript files, peer review comments, author rebuttals and revised materials. Note: This was optional for articles submitted before 13 February 2023.
Peer reviewers are encouraged (but not required) to provide their names to the authors when submitting their peer review. If they agree to provide their name, then their personal profile page will reflect a public acknowledgment that they performed a review (even if the article is rejected). If the article is accepted, then reviewers who provided their name will be associated with the article itself.
The authors considered all the comments and suggestion made by the reviewers. I see the manuscript improved and ready to be accepted.
[# PeerJ Staff Note - this decision was reviewed and approved by Julin Maloof, a PeerJ Section Editor covering this Section #]
Dear authors, please consider all reviewers' comments and explain the reasons should you decide not to make some of the suggested changes to the manuscript. The English language should be improved.
[# PeerJ Staff Note: Please ensure that all review and editorial comments are addressed in a response letter and any edits or clarifications mentioned in the letter are also inserted into the revised manuscript where appropriate. #]
[# PeerJ Staff Note: The Academic Editor has identified that the English language must be improved. PeerJ can provide language editing services - please contact us at copyediting@peerj.com for pricing (be sure to provide your manuscript number and title) #]
no comment
no comment
I didn't think the findings of this paper were very novel. For many journals, the low impact/value of the findings would not merit publication. Simply saying that maintaining temperature and RH within optimum ranges is expected.
All my editorial comments were made on the PDF.
The English language can be improved to ensure that readers can clearly understand your text. Some examples where the language could be improved
include lines 194,202,203 etc
A more detailed literature review can be provided such as that helped to select the optimum temperature range
Primary research is on finding out the importance of air temperature and relative humidity maintenance in strawberry yield. the theme of the research is relevant. However, the novelty and relevance of this study should be elaborated explicitly in the introduction.
The statistical method is seldom described in the paper. A holistic description of the methods used in the study will be beneficial to the readers.
The selection criteria of the optimum temperature range are not given in the text apart from a statement in line 225. It needs more explanation as it is critical to the paper.
As per table 3, the SE is comparatively higher than the estimate (especially in case of 2020-21).Then, how can these estimates be statistically relevant considering that for 2020-2021 season the number of farms is also not less as compared to 2017-2018.
All text and materials provided via this peer-review history page are made available under a Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.