All reviews of published articles are made public. This includes manuscript files, peer review comments, author rebuttals and revised materials. Note: This was optional for articles submitted before 13 February 2023.
Peer reviewers are encouraged (but not required) to provide their names to the authors when submitting their peer review. If they agree to provide their name, then their personal profile page will reflect a public acknowledgment that they performed a review (even if the article is rejected). If the article is accepted, then reviewers who provided their name will be associated with the article itself.
Thank you for the revised manuscript and English correction done with certification
[# PeerJ Staff Note - this decision was reviewed and approved by Bob Patton, a PeerJ Section Editor covering this Section #]
Dear author,
The manuscript is significantly improved. However, I have a concern with the typography such as capital in the first sentence, language and grammar, and the abbreviation (eg. PASS (Power Analysis and Sample Size) --> should be Power Analysis and Sample Size (PASS)). Please read the manuscript carefully to revise it and you can send the manuscript for professional English editing (can be proven by certificate).
[# PeerJ Staff Note: The Academic Editor has identified that the English language must be improved. PeerJ can provide language editing services - please contact us at copyediting@peerj.com for pricing (be sure to provide your manuscript number and title). #]
Dear Author,
Please consider and address the comments from reviewers carefully.
overall, the article is very interesting and there is no research that discusses this. there are only a few notes. attached notes for author and editor.
the experimental design was clearly enough, please focus on ethical consideration. How did the researcher avoid bias in the selection of participants according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria?
Validity and reliability was done.
just complate the major finding on your research. there are only a few notes. attached notes for author and editor.
no comment.
no comment.
no comment.
Introduction:
1. Please add the data of nurses experiencing stress in your research location.
2. Please add the efforts or intervention that have been made by the government, hospitals, nurse associations, or other research to reduce nurse stress levels and the results. So that pet ownership interventions can be unique and novelty in this study.
3. The author has explained the phenomenon well. Please include the theory or theoretical framework that underlies this research so that it becomes the basis for selecting variables and demographic characteristics of respondents.
Conclusion:
1. Please paraphrase the conclusion in abstract and in main text. The sentences in both sections are repetition.
1. The English language is straightforward, easy to understand.
2. The literature references supported the discussion points.
3. Professional article structure, figures, tables and raw data are shared.
4. Results are related to the hypothesis.
The methods are described for replication.
The benefit to the nurse population may be beneficial to China's context.
Conclusions are related to the findings, but may be general.
Referencing check, proofreading and copyediting are necessary.
All text and materials provided via this peer-review history page are made available under a Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.