Review History


All reviews of published articles are made public. This includes manuscript files, peer review comments, author rebuttals and revised materials. Note: This was optional for articles submitted before 13 February 2023.

Peer reviewers are encouraged (but not required) to provide their names to the authors when submitting their peer review. If they agree to provide their name, then their personal profile page will reflect a public acknowledgment that they performed a review (even if the article is rejected). If the article is accepted, then reviewers who provided their name will be associated with the article itself.

View examples of open peer review.

Summary

  • The initial submission of this article was received on June 7th, 2022 and was peer-reviewed by 2 reviewers and the Academic Editor.
  • The Academic Editor made their initial decision on July 19th, 2022.
  • The first revision was submitted on August 2nd, 2022 and was reviewed by 1 reviewer and the Academic Editor.
  • The article was Accepted by the Academic Editor on August 10th, 2022.

Version 0.2 (accepted)

· Aug 10, 2022 · Academic Editor

Accept

Please review for potential grammatical corrections.

[# PeerJ Staff Note - this decision was reviewed and approved by Paula Soares, a PeerJ Section Editor covering this Section #]

Reviewer 1 ·

Basic reporting

This manuscript has been thoroughly reviewed and corrections have been incorporated.

Experimental design

Sufficient.

Validity of the findings

Robust.

Version 0.1 (original submission)

· Jul 19, 2022 · Academic Editor

Major Revisions

Please address all the comments.

[# PeerJ Staff Note: Please ensure that all review and editorial comments are addressed in a response letter and any edits or clarifications mentioned in the letter are also inserted into the revised manuscript where appropriate. #]

Reviewer 1 ·

Basic reporting

In the manuscript entitled “Transcriptomic analysis and physiological characteristics of exogenous naphthylacetic acid application to regulate the healing process of oriental melon grafted onto squash”, authors investigated the effects of exogenous NAA application on histological changes, enzyme activities involved in ROS scavenging, endogenous hormones contents and transcriptome profiling of graft junction during graft union development.
The authors claimed that the exogenous NAA application could accelerate the graft healing process of oriental melon scion grafted onto squash rootstock, increase the SOD, POD, PAL, and PPO activities during graft union development and enhance the contents of IAA, GA3, and ZR in specific stage. The genes related to plant hormone signal-transduction, phenylpropanoid biosynthesis, phenylalanine metabolism, ROS scavenging system, and vascular bundle formation were differently expressed after NAA treatment. The manuscript provided a theoretical and practical basis for further improving the efficiency of melon grafting and the points of the manuscript is a very interesting topic regarding to commercial grafted melon cultivation.

Experimental design

1. In line 70-73 of Introduction: In the grafted seedlings cultivation practice, studies showed that applying exogenous plant growth regulators could effectively promote the healing of grafted seedlings, shorten the healing period of grafting, and improve the quality of grafted seedlings. The types of growth regulators and applied plants should be detailly described. In addition, related references should be cited.
2. In Materials and methods, the numbers of technical replicates should be indicated in determination of enzyme activities, endogenous hormones contents and qRT-PCR experiments. In present manuscript, just three biological replicates were introduced.
3. For the effects of exogenous NAA application on histological changes of graft junction, paraffin sections in all selected period should be provided to better understand the effect of exogenous NAA on graft healing process.

Validity of the findings

1. In line 179-180: SOD activity of NAA treatment was significantly higher than CK at the IL and CA stage (Figure 2A). The conclusion is incomplete. As shown in Figure 2A, SOD activity was also significantly increased in VB stage after NAA treatment.
2. For the effect of NAA application on GA3 content, the description in Results (line 198-201) and Discussion (line 372-373) parts were inconsistent with the data of Figure 3B.
3. In Figure 10, the RNA-Seq data of selected ten genes should also be provided to validate the correlation between RNA-Seq and qRT-PCR results.
4. Supplemental files should also be cited in manuscript.

Additional comments

1. The full name of the abbreviations such as IL, CA, VB, SOD, POD, PAL and PPO should be indicated when first mentioned.
2. There were numerous minor typographical errors in manuscript. For example, there were spelling mistakes in line 61 “uniqueities” and line 316 “tow”. Figure 10 was misquoted in line 299. In line 429, the exact stages are not specified. Therefore, the manuscript should be thoroughly reviewed.

·

Basic reporting

The manuscript entitled “Transcriptomic analysis and physiological characteristics of exogenous naphthylacetic acid application to regulate the healing process of oriental melon grafted onto squash” is an interesting study about the effects of exogenous naphthylacetic acid application on histological changes, enzyme activities involved in ROS scavenging, endogenous hormones contents and transcriptome profiling of graft junction during graft union development.”The authors have reported that application of naphthylacetic acid could accelerate the graft healing process of oriental melon scion grafted onto squash rootstock, increase the SOD, POD, PAL, and PPO activities during graft union development and enhance the contents of IAA, GA3, and ZR in specific stage Moreover, the exogenous NAA application signiûcantly promoted the expression of genes involved in the hormone signal-transduction pathway, ROS scavenging system, and vascular bundle formation.”. The manuscript clearly describes the possibilities to improve the efficiency of melon grafting and the points of the manuscript is a very interesting topic regarding to commercial grafted melon cultivation.

Experimental design

Materials and methods: The paraffin sections in all selected period could help to understand the effects of NAA application.

Validity of the findings

1. Figure 2 could be better discussed and conclusions based on the resuls can be improved.
2. The RNA-Seq data of selected ten genes could better validate the correlation between RNA-Seq and qRT-PCR results.

Additional comments

1. The full name of the abbreviations should be used when mentioned for the first time in manuscript.
2. Information about supplementary material should be mentioned in main manuscript.
3. Typographical errors should be removed before submission of revision.

All text and materials provided via this peer-review history page are made available under a Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.