All reviews of published articles are made public. This includes manuscript files, peer review comments, author rebuttals and revised materials. Note: This was optional for articles submitted before 13 February 2023.
Peer reviewers are encouraged (but not required) to provide their names to the authors when submitting their peer review. If they agree to provide their name, then their personal profile page will reflect a public acknowledgment that they performed a review (even if the article is rejected). If the article is accepted, then reviewers who provided their name will be associated with the article itself.
Congratulations to the Authors and they have successfully addressed all the valid comments of the reviewers.
Please make the changes mark the changes. Also please provide a point to point response to both the Reviewers.
[# PeerJ Staff Note: The review process has identified that the English language must be improved. PeerJ can provide language editing services - please contact us at copyediting@peerj.com for pricing (be sure to provide your manuscript number and title) #]
no comment
no comment
no comment
1. In Abstract, the authors wrote that the aim of the study was to determine the factors associated with patient care manager role and the implementation of the clinical pathway among nurses in private hospitals.
In Conclusion, the authors wrote: The role of patient care manager and compliance with COVID-19 clinical pathways correlated significantly
There is no correlation between the aim and the conclusion (the aim and conclusion not in line). If the aims of the study is: to determine the factors associated with patient care manager role….. , the authors should mention what are the factors.
2. In Abstract:
Objective. The aim of this study aims to determine the factors associated with patient care manager role and the implementation of the clinical pathway among nurses in private hospitals.
In Introduction:
Therefore, this study aims to measure the role of nurse managers and their relationship to the COVID-19 clinical pathway.
The aims of the study in Abstract and Introduction are different, which one is true?
3. Introduction is too long. The authors should write introduction briefly that contains four main components: general background information, specific background information, an explanation of the gap in our knowledge that the study was designed to fill, and a statement of study objective.
In this Introduction, we could not find what is the problem/background of the study and why is it important ?
4. In Material and methods.
In study setting and participants. Why the authors choose a private hospital ?
5. In Discussion
a. The authors stated that: The results showed that the high factors affecting the level of clinical pathways implementation were the length of service above ten years….
How about : age (25-35 years), Gender, and educational level????
b. In Results, the authors stated: Based on the analysis, three factors dominate the high role of nurses in the clinical pathway application namely facilitating communication and coordination between members of the health care team (95.8%), educating COVID-19 patients (94.6%) and empowering the patients to solve problems (92.9%).
Why the authors did not discuss/analyze factor empowering the patients to solve problems (92.9%) in Discussion section???
The article is written well. However little grammar and spell check needs to be done
yes, it is an original research and the study design is cross-sectional
The sample size is not sufficient for this nature of research. Few changes required is marked in the draft
Some more statistical support is required. My comments are marked in the draft
Some information on the validity and reliability of the Indonesian version of the scale is required
The research is performed well and written properly. However some changes to be done.
All text and materials provided via this peer-review history page are made available under a Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.