Since COVID-19, caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), was declared as a pandemic disease by the World Health Organization in early 2020, many countries, organizations and companies have tried to find the best way to diagnose the virus and contain its spreading. SARS-CoV-2 is a positive-sense single RNA (+ssRNA) coronavirus and mainly spreads through droplets, respiratory secretions, and direct contact. The early detection of the virus plays a central role in lowering COVID19 incidents and mortality rates. Thus, finding a simple, accurate, cheap and quick detection approach for SARS-CoV-2 at early stage of the viral infection is urgent and at high demand all around the world. The Food and Drug Administration and other health agencies have declared Emergency Use Authorization to develop diagnostic methods for COVID-19 and fulfill the demand. However, not all developed methods are appropriate and selecting a suitable method is challenging. Among all detection methods, rRT-PCR is the gold standard method. Unlike molecular methods, serological methods lack the ability of early detection with low accuracy. In this review, we summarized the current knowledge about COVID-19 detection methods aiming to highlight the advantages and disadvantages of molecular and serological methods.
COVID-19SARS-CoV-2rRT-PCRID NOW COVID-19Isothermal amplificationCRISPR-Cas12LFAELISAThe authors received no funding for this work.Introduction
In January 2020, World Health Organization (WHO) initially named a newly identified β-coronavirus that caused many pneumonia cases in December 2019 in Wuhan, China as the 2019-novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) (Zhu et al., 2020; Zhou et al., 2020). Eventually, WHO and Coronavirus Study Group of International committee officially named the virus as SARS-CoV-2 and the disease as coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) (Guo et al., 2020). SARS-CoV-2 is a member of the coronaviruses (CoV) family and it is an enveloped, non-segmented, positive-sense single RNA (+ssRNA) coronavirus (Zhu et al., 2020). In early 2020, the whole genome sequence of SARS-CoV-2 was revealed which was 29.9 kb (Wu et al., 2020) and 96.2% and 79.5% identical to a bat CoV RaTG13 and SARS-CoV genome sequences, respectively (Zhou et al., 2020; Lu et al., 2020). CoVs genome includes six to twelve open reading frames (ORFs) (Song et al., 2019). The first and largest ORF (ORF1a/b) occupies approximately two-thirds of the viral RNA (De Wilde et al., 2018; Cui, Li & Shi, 2019) and the remaining one-third of the genome encodes the four main structural proteins which includes spike (S), envelope (E), membrane (M) and nucleocapsid (N) protein and other accessory proteins (Cui, Li & Shi, 2019; Chen, Liu & Guo, 2020; Yang & Zhang, 2015; Zhang Lab, 2020). The S protein plays a major role in SARS-CoV-2 infectious process and it is a promising target for vaccine and therapeutic development (Jiang, Hillyer & Du, 2020; Du et al., 2009).
COVID-19 virus is a highly contagious and spreads through droplets, respiratory secretions, and direct contact (Cascella et al., 2020; Yang & Wang, 2020). Recent studies reported that the virus was isolated from fecal swabs and blood samples of COVID-19 patients (Zhang et al., 2020; Liu et al., 2020) suggesting that the virus may have different routes to transmit between humans. The number of SARS-CoV-2 virus that causes ill to human is not clearly defined yet; however, a large hospitalized cohort (n = 1,145) was analyzed and the overall mean log10 viral load was 5·6 copies per mL (Pujadas et al., 2020). Elderly people and whom has chronic underlying diseases, such as but not limited to hypertension (Kreutz et al., 2020; Schiffrin et al., 2020), diabetes (Hussain, Bhowmik & Do Vale Moreira, 2020; Fang, Karakiulakis & Roth, 2020), and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (Lippi & Henry, 2020), are the most vulnerable (Muniyappa & Gubbi, 2020; Emami et al., 2020). Current studies showed that the median age of COVID-19 patients was 47–59 years and females were the minority, less than 46% (Wang et al., 2020; Guan et al., 2020; Li et al., 2020). While children and youth have lower rates of COVID-19 infection compared to elder people (Tian et al., 2020; Chan et al., 2020; Davies et al., 2020). The incubation period of the virus is one to fourteen days with 3–7 days being the most (Lauer et al., 2020).
It has been reported that the clinical symptoms of confirmed COVID-19 patients were varied from mild flu-like symptoms to very severe respiratory symptoms and even respiratory and kidney failures and death (Huang et al., 2020; Sohrabi et al., 2020). According to WHO and other sources fever, dry cough and tiredness are the most common symptoms while sore throat, diarrhea, headache, conjunctivitis, rash on skin and discoloration of fingers or toes are less common symptoms of COVID-19 patients (Wei et al., 2020; Kooraki et al., 2020; World Health Organization, 2020). A recent study used an app-based symptom tracker showed that people who had COVID-19 loss of smell and taste and those with a positive test result (65.03%) intended to have anosmia higher than those with a negative test result (21.71%) (Drew et al., 2020; Menni et al., 2020). Although COVID-19 became a pandemic disease, the mortality rate is low (3.4%) compared to SARS and MERS patients, 9.6% and 35% respectively (De Wit et al., 2016).
The first incidents of COVID-19 were diagnosed in Wuhan, China, in December 2019. After a few months, WHO announced COVID-19 as a pandemic disease across the whole world. As of 2 July 2020, a total of 10,716,063 confirmed cases globally, 2,686,587 confirmed in USA and 8,029,476 outside of USA, with 516,726 globally deaths were reported by the Coronavirus Resource Center, Johns Hopkins University (Coronavirus Resource Center, 2020). Having a rapid and accurate diagnostic method at early stage of infection can help to contain the pandemic. Thus, many companies and laboratories were given authority under Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) restrictions to develop diagnostic methods. Consequently, hundreds of diagnostic kits based on different methods are available now, but selecting the proper method requires further investigation. In this review, the standard and current molecular and serological detection methods for SARS-CoV-2 will be discussed and highlighted (Fig. 1). As of today, among all detection methods rRT-PCR is the gold standard method. Unlike molecular methods, serological methods lack the ability of early detection with low accuracy. This review intends to help health care providers and related branches to choose the appropriate method for battling the COVID-19 pandemic and rise the public knowledge about the methods that could be used to detect the virus.
10.7717/peerj.10180/fig-1
Workflow summary of molecular and serological detection methods of COVID-19.
The figure was created with BioRender.com.
Survey Methodology
This literature review explored the peer-reviewed and preprint literatures with mainly focusing on COVID-19 disease and its molecular and serological detection methods. We searched the following databases and websites from March to July 2020: Google Scholar, PubMed, bioRxiv, medRxiv, I-TASSER, CDC, WHO, Coronavirus Resource Center (Johns Hopkins University), Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CCDC) and National Institute of Infectious Diseases (NIID). And the top keywords that searched were: COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, coronavirus, genomic RNA, protein structure, ACE2, transmission, symptoms, molecular detection methods, serological detection methods, rRT-PCR, ID NOW COVID-19, isothermal amplification, CRISPR, SARS-CoV-2 DETECTR, LAMP, recombinase polymerase amplification (RPA), Lateral flow assay (LFA) and Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA).
Diagnostic methods
Under the pressure of the pandemic, COVID-19 test demand is sharply increased which pushes a lot of biotech companies/ inventors to produce different kits based on variant approaches to detect SARS-CoV-2. The molecular and serological methods are the main methods to detect the virus.
Molecular methods
Based on how viral RNA be processed and detected, there are three major molecular methods which are: real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (rRT-PCR), isothermal amplification, and clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR) based methods. All these methods follow the same protocol that have been recommended by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) for collecting specimens from COVID-19 patients (Centers of Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), 2020).
rRT-PCR method
It is the gold standard and reliable molecular method to diagnose SARS-CoV-2 with high sensitivity (positive agreement) and specificity (negative agreement) (Corman et al., 2020). This method has been developed by several laboratories to detect COVID-19 virus (Amrane et al., 2020; Capobianchi et al., 2020; Chu et al., 2020). In this method (Fig. 2B), cDNA is generated from the extracted RNA of COVID-19 virus with specific primers for the following genes 2019nCoV-N1 (N1), 2019nCoV-N2 (N2) and RNAse P (RP; internal control) as recommended by U.S. CDC (Table 1) and other health agencies (Corman et al., 2020; Niu et al., 2020; Nao et al., 2020) (Table S1). The upper respiratory system’s swabs are the main specimens that are used to detect COVID-19 virus; however, serum, ocular secretions and stool can be used as well (Xia et al., 2020; Carter et al., 2020; The COVID-19 Investigation Team, 2020). If both genes (N1 and N2) were positive, it is considered as a positive sample as shown in Table 2. The positive result confirms the presence of viral RNA in the specimen, but not necessarily the virus viability (Sethuraman, Jeremiah & Ryo, 2020). Besides the internal control (RP), there are three controls that must be run to make sure the result is legitimate (Table S2). These controls are 2019-nCoV Positive Control (nCoVPC), No Template Control (NTC) and Human Specimen Control (HSC) (Centers of Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), 2020). Even though rRT-RPC is the gold standard method and the most widely used for diagnosing COVID-19 virus in clinic and research laboratories, it has some limitations (Kubina & Dziedzic, 2020). Beside highly costed, professional skills needed, it is time-consuming (requires 2–5 days from collecting a sample till getting the result) and must be done in a laboratory.
10.7717/peerj.10180/fig-2
Schematic flowchart of molecular detection methods for COVID-19 virus.
(A) A viral RNA is directly amplified and detected from the sample by isothermal amplification method (e.g., ID NOW COVID-19). (B) The standard rRT-PCR method is illustrated where a viral RNA is extracted and converted into cDNA. Specific areas of cDNA (target genes) are amplified and detected by rRT-PCR. (C) Demonstration of CRISPR-Cas12 based method. After amplifying specific areas of extracted viral RNA, the Cas12 enzyme recognizes specific sequences and then cleaves the ssDNA probe. The cleavage probes are visualized as a red line in the lateral flow strip. The figure was created with BioRender.com.
10.7717/peerj.10180/table-1
Primers and probes that have been recommended by the U.S.CDC to detect SARS-CoV-2 by rRT-PCR.
Gene target
Description
Oligonucleotide Sequence (5′>3′)
Label
2019-nCoV_N1
2019-nCoV_N1 Forward Primer
5′-GAC CCC AAA ATC AGC GAA AT-3′
None
2019-nCoV_N1 Reverse Primer
5′-TCT GGT TAC TGC CAG TTG AAT CTG-3′
None
2019-nCoV_N1 Probe
5′-FAM-ACC CCG CAT TAC GTT TGG TGG ACC-BHQ1-3′
FAM, BHQ-1
2019-nCoV_N2
2019-nCoV_N2 Forward Primer
5′-TTA CAA ACA TTG GCC GCA AA-3′
None
2019-nCoV_N2 Reverse Primer
5′-GCG CGA CAT TCC GAA GAA-3′
None
2019-nCoV_N2 Probe
5′-FAM-ACA ATT TGC CCC CAG CGC TTC AG-BHQ1-3′
FAM, BHQ-1
RNAse P
RNAse P Forward Primer
5′-AGA TTT GGA CCT GCG AGC G-3′
None
RNAse P Reverse Primer
5′-GAG CGG CTG TCT CCA CAA GT-3′
None
RNAse P Probe
5′-FAM—TTC TGA CCT GAA GGC TCT GCG CG—BHQ-1-3′
FAM, BHQ-1
10.7717/peerj.10180/table-2
Expected results and their interpretations of rRT-PCR method for COVID-19 specimens.
2019nCoV-N1
2019nCoV-N2
RNaseP
Result (SARS-CoV-2)
+
+
+/−
Positive
If only 1 of the 2 targets is positive
+/−
In conclusive
−
−
+
Negative
−
−
−
Invalid
Isothermal amplification-based method
It is another molecular approach where a nucleic acid is rapidly and specifically amplified by a polymerase with high strand displacement activity (e.g., optimized Bst polymerase) and different sets of primers at constant temperature (60–65 °C) without the need of thermal cycler (Notomi et al., 2000). ID NOW COVID-19 (Abbott) is a recent example of using isothermal amplification technique to detect COVID-19 virus in clinics. It is molecular point-of-care platform in the United States of America and used under an EUA only to diagnose SARS-CoV-2. In this test a certain region of RdRp gene of SARS-CoV-2 is amplified by specific primers and results are displayed in a short time compared to rRT-PCR (Fig. 2A). It can show a positive result as little as 5 min and a negative result in 13 min. It has a performance of ≥94% sensitivity and ≥98% specificity compared to lab-based PCR reference tests as it is advertised by the manufacturers (Abbott, 2020). However, Harrington et al. (2020) results that published in a peer-reviewed journal showed that the overall sensitivity and specificity were 74.73% and 99.41%, respectively.
CRISPR-Cas12 based method
In this method (e.g., SARS-CoV-2 DETECTR), the RNA virus is extracted from a specimen and designated regions of N2, E, RP genes are amplified at 62 °C for 20 min by specific primes through Reverse Transcription Loop-mediated Isothermal Amplification (RT-LAMP) approach (Wang et al., 2020; Lamb et al., 2020; Hong et al., 2004). Then, designed Cas12 gRNAs direct Cas12 protein to specific areas of the above amplified genes where a reporter molecule (a single stranded DNA (ssDNA) probe) is cleaved. This reaction occurs at 37 °C for 10 min and the result is visualized by a fluorescent reader or a lateral flow strip (Fig. 2C). Both genes N2 and E must be positive to consider the sample is positive (Table 3). Broughton et al. (2020) showed that SARS-CoV-2 DETECTR was reliable to detect coronavirus in respiratory swab samples with 90% sensitivity and 100% specificity. Unlike rRT-PCR, this method is fast (<50 min), cheap, and point-of-care test (POCT). It requires less equipment and the result can be visualized by naked eyes. However, it requires troubleshooting and specific design of all enzymes, primers, and reporters that are used in this method.
10.7717/peerj.10180/table-3
Expected results and their interpretations of SARS-CoV-2 DETECTR method for COVID-19 specimens.
N gene
E gene
RNaseP
Result (SARS-CoV-2)
+
+
+/−
Positive
+
−
+/−
Indeterminate
−
+
+/−
Indeterminate
−
−
+
Negative
−
−
−
Invalid
In addition to the above molecular methods, Recombinase polymerase amplification (RPA) (Amer et al., 2013) has been developed and/or integrated with other methods to detect COVID-19 virus. This method does not require thermal cycler and can be used as POCT with low cost and high sensitivity and specificity. The drawback is that it requires several specific designed primers which could be difficult to obtain and the result of this method could be interfered by virus quantification and debris (Yu et al., 2020).
Serological methods
Unlike molecular methods, serological methods (also called antibody tests) can be applied to detect past and current SARS-CoV-2 infection and monitor the progress of the disease periods and immune response. They can detect the presence of antibodies (e.g., IgG, IgM and IgA) in a COVID-19 patient’s serum and plasma. Other biological fluids such as but not limited to saliva and sputum could be used as well. Antibodies are produced as a defense mechanism by the immune system against SARS-CoV-2. First, IgM is produced after a few days of infection and last for approximately two weeks which followed by IgG production that is last longer (To et al., 2020; Xiang et al., 2020). Thus, detecting IgM in a patient’s sample indicates early-stage infection while detecting IgG indicates a current or prior infection (Sethuraman, Jeremiah & Ryo, 2020). In addition to lacking an early detection, accuracy is the main challenge of these approaches where crossover could occur with other antibodies that produced as a result of infection of other coronavirus family members such as SARS-CoV (U.S. Food & Drug Administration, 2020; Maxim, Niebo & Utell, 2014).
Lateral flow assay
It is one of the most popular serological method that has been applied in clinics to detect antigens (Boisen et al., 2015), antibodies (Nielsen et al., 2008), and amplified nucleic acids (Koczula & Gallotta, 2016; Rohrman et al., 2012) in variant biological samples such as blood (serum or plasma) (Schramm et al., 2015; Magambo et al., 2014), urine (Moreno et al., 2017) and saliva (Carrio et al., 2015). LFA is a paper-like membrane strip that is coated with two lines. The first line, the test line, contains anti-human IgG/IgM antibodies, while the second line, the control line, contains anti-rabbit IgG antibodies. After adding a patients specimen (e.g., blood) into the sample well, IgG/IgM antibodies are moved by capillary action toward the lines crossing through the conjugated pad where a specific conjugated antigen (e.g., gold COVID-19 antigen conjugate) and rabbit-gold conjugated antibodies are impeded (Parolo, De la Escosura-Muniz & Merkoci, 2013). IgG/IgM antibodies are interacted and made a complex with gold COVID-19 antigen conjugate. The complex binds anti-human IgG/IgM antibodies and immobilizes at the test line, while the rabbit-gold conjugate antibodies bind anti-rabbit IgG antibody and immobilized at the control line. The result will be visible as a red line due to the accumulation of gold particles. If both test and control lines appear red, the result is positive and negative when only the control line appears red. If both lines disappear or only the test line appears, the result is invalid (Fig. 3). The advantages of FLA are rapid (10–30 min), cheap, no need for professional skills and portable (POCT). It can be done by 1–2 blood drops and the result is visualized by naked eyes without an expensive equipment. The drawback of FLA is a qualitative method, tells the presence or absence of antibodies against the virus without telling how much they were in a patient’s sample, and it less accurate compared to rRT-PCR. It was showed that FLA has clinical 57% sensitivity and 100% specificity for IgM and 81% sensitivity and 100% specificity for IgG (Xiang et al., 2020).
10.7717/peerj.10180/fig-3
Schematic flowchart of FLA.
A sample is loaded in the sample well (A) and incubated to allow the capillary action to move sample antibodies (IgG/IgM) forward (B). Gold COVID-19 antigen conjugates from the conjugate pad recognize and interact with sample antibodies forming complexes (C) that are immobilized by anti-human IgG/IgM antibodies and display the test red line (D). Control antibodies (rabbit- gold conjugates) are immobilized by anti-rabbit IgG antibodies and show the control red line (E). (F) FLA results possibilities are illustrated. The figure was created with BioRender.com.
Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay
It is another serological method and called enzyme immunoassay (EIA). ELISA is a plate-based method that has been used for detecting and quantifying soluble substances such as proteins and antibodies in clinic and research laboratories. It includes direct and indirect formats (Zhang et al., 2014). The indirect ELISA, the most popular and more sensitive than the direct ELISA, an antigen (e.g., a recombinant protein (N protein) of SARS-CoV-2 virus) is coated onto the inner surface of 96-well or 384-well polystyrene plates (Gao et al., 2015). A diluted patient’s plasma which may have anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG/IgM is added to the wells. The plate is incubated for one hour to allow the antibodies to interact with coated antigens. After washing the plate to eliminate unspecific interactions, a conjugated antibody with a reported enzyme such as horseradish peroxidase (HRP) or alkaline phosphatase (AP) is added to form sandwich complexes (Li et al., 2013; Zhang et al., 2015). These complexes are detected and quantified by adding a substrate (e.g., 3,3′,5,5′-tetramethylbenzidine) that is utilized by the report enzyme and leads to change in the reaction color (Madersbacher & Berger, 1991; Lee, Harrison & Lewis, 1990). The color is detected and measured by a plate reader (Fig. 4). ELISA is relatively fast (2–5 h) and cheap compared to rRT-PCR, and it is similar to FLA regard to accuracy. It has been reported that ELISA results were 50% (IgG) and 81% (IgM) for patients on day zero and became 81% (IgG) and 100%(IgM) on day five of SARS-CoV-2 infection (Zhang et al., 2020). Another study accomplished by Xiang et al. (2020) showed that using ELISA to detect IgM and IgG on day four of symptom onsite revealed a sensitivity of 77.3% and specificity of 100% for IgM while those were 83.3% and 95% respectively for IgG.
10.7717/peerj.10180/fig-4
Schematic flowchart of indirect ELISA.
A coated SARS-CoV-2 protein (antigen) onto wells of ELISA plate (A) interacts with the first antibody (anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody) that is in a patient’s sample (B). (C) After adding a secondary antibody (a conjugated antibody), it recognizes and interacts with the first antibodies. The reaction is developed by adding a substrate (D) which is cleaved by the conjugated enzyme and changes the reaction color after incubation (E) and (F), respectively. (G) Results are read by ELISA plate reader. The figure was created with BioRender.com.
Worth mention that there are other serological methods that are less common than FLA and ELISA (La Marca et al., 2020). A colloidal gold immunochromatography assay (GICA), and Chemiluminescent immunoassay (CLIA) were developed to diagnose COVID-19; however, they have low sensitivity at the beginning of the infection (Infantino et al., 2020; Zhang et al., 2020). Pan et al. (2020) reported that the sensitivity of GICA were 11.1% on the first week and 92.9% on the second weeks after the onset of symptoms. Neutralization assays, on the other hands, are standard methods for determining antibody efficacy (e.g., serum virus neutralization (SVN) assay). They are used to check whether a patient has active antibodies that can neutralize the SARS-CoV-2 infection (Gauger & Vincent, 2020; Muruato et al., 2020). These assays play a key role in determining if an individual is eligible to donate his/her convalescent plasma as a treatment for seriously ill people although such treatment has not been fully validated (Shen et al., 2020).
Both molecular and serological methods are not perfect in terms of detecting COVID-19 virus and each method has its own limitations (Bisoffi et al., 2020). Though molecular methods are more reliable than serological methods, both methods could give false results due to various reasons. For instance, incorrect sampling, inadequate viral material in the specimen, improper RNA extraction, cross-reactions with other viral species, contamination and technical issues could lead to positive and negative false results. To overcome such issues and increase the certainty of given results, these methods can be followed by secondary diagnostic methods such as a chest CT scan and x-ray imaging (Yang et al., 2020; Wang et al., 2020; Wong et al., 2020).
Conclusion
Scientists have made significant progress in the characterization of the COVID-19 virus and how to limit its spreading. Also, they are working hard on diagnostic methods and finding therapies and vaccines against the virus. Currently, neither an approved vaccine nor a specific antiviral treatment is available for COVID-19 disease. Thus, detecting SARS-CoV-2 at the early infectious stage by a rapid and accurate diagnostic method could save thousands of lives. In this review we have discussed and summarized the current knowledge about molecular and serological methods that have been used to detect SARS-CoV-2. Though the molecular methods are more expensive, slower, and less available than serological methods, they are more accurate and rRT-PCR is the gold standard method among them (Table 4). Further research and collaboration between scientists and companies are needed to overcome some limitations of current methods and might find a new and better avenue to detect the virus. For instance, standardized the methods, produce new and high-quality kits and make them available at low cost will make the current methods more reliable.
10.7717/peerj.10180/table-4
Comparison between molecular and serological methods for detecting COVID-19 virus.
Molecular methods
Serological methods
Technique based
rRT-PCR
Isothermal amplification
CRISPR-Cas12
LFA
ELISA
Sample
RNA
RNA
RNA
Ag or Ab
Ag or Ab
Accuracy
High
High/Moderate
High
Low
Moderate
Time*
Hours
Minutes
Minutes
Minutes
Hours
Professional skills need
Yes
Yes
YES/No
No
Yes
POCT
No
Yes/No
Yes/No
Yes
No
Availability
Limited
Limited
Limited
Available
Available
Cost
Very high
High
Average
Low
Average
High throughput
Yes
No
No
No
Yes
Note:
Time that is required for running the test without preparation time.
Primers and probes that have been recommended by other institutions to perform rRT-PCR and detect SARS-CoV-2.
10.7717/peerj.10180/supp-2
The rRT-PCR controls with expected results and interpretations.
Additional Information and DeclarationsCompeting Interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Author Contributions
Ahmed E. Dhamad conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, and approved the final draft.
Muna A. Abdal Rhida performed the experiments, analyzed the data, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, and approved the final draft.
Data Availability
The following information was supplied regarding data availability:
This is a review article; there is no raw data.
ReferencesAbbottID NOW™ COVID-192020https://www.alere.com/en/home/product-details/id-now-covid-19.htmlAmerHMAbd El WahedAShalabyMAAlmajhdiFNHufertFTWeidmannMA new approach for diagnosis of bovine coronavirus using a reverse transcription recombinase polymerase amplification assay2013193233734010.1016/j.jviromet.2013.06.027AmraneSTissot-DupontHDoudierBEldinCHocquartMMailheMDudouetPOrmieresEAilhaudLParolaPLagierJCBrouquiPZandottiCNinoveLLucianiLBoschiCLa ScolaBRaoultDMillionMColsonPGautretPRapid viral diagnosis and ambulatory management of suspected COVID-19 cases presenting at the infectious diseases referral hospital in Marseille, France202036101632BisoffiZPomariEDeianaMPiubelliCRonzoniNBeltrameABertoliGRiccardiNPerandinFFormentiFGobbiFBuonfrateDSilvaRSensitivity, specificity and predictive values of molecular and serological tests for COVID-19: a longitudinal study in emergency room2020109E669BoisenMLOottamasathienDJonesABMillettMMNelsonDSBornholdtZAFuscoMLAbelsonDMOdaSHartnettJNRowlandMMHeinrichMLAkdagMGobaAMomohMFullahMBaimbaFGbakieMSafaSFonnieRKannehLCrossRWGeisbertJBGeisbertTWKulakoskyPCGrantDSShafferJGSchieffelinJSWilsonRBSaphireEOBrancoLMGarryRFKhanSHPittsKRConsortium Viral Hemorrhagic FeverDevelopment of prototype filovirus recombinant antigen immunoassays2015212Suppl. 2S359S367BroughtonJPDengXYuGFaschingCLSinghJStreithorstJGranadosASotomayor-GonzalezAZornKGopezAHsuEGuWMillerSPanCYGuevaraHWadfordDAChenJSChiuCYRapid detection of 2019 novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 using a CRISPR-based DETECTR lateral flow assay202010.1101/2020.03.06.20032334CapobianchiMRRuecaMMessinaFGiombiniECarlettiFColavitaFCastillettiCLalleEBordiLVairoFNicastriEIppolitoGGruberCEMBartoliniBMolecular characterization of SARS-CoV-2 from the first case of COVID-19 in Italy202026795495610.1016/j.cmi.2020.03.025CarrioASampedroCSanchez-LopezJLPimientaMCampoyPAutomated low-cost smartphone-based lateral flow saliva test reader for drugs-of-abuse detection201515112956929593CarterLJGarnerLVSmootJWLiYZhouQSavesonCJSassoJMGreggACSoaresDJBeskidTRJerveySRLiuCAssay techniques and test development for COVID-19 diagnosis20206559160510.1021/acscentsci.0c00501CascellaMRajnikMCuomoADulebohnSCDi NapoliRFeatures, Evaluation and Treatment Coronavirus (COVID-19)2020Treasure IslandStatPearlsCenters of Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)Resources for laboratories working on coronavirus (COVID-19)2020https://www.cdc.govChanJFYuanSKokKHToKKChuHYangJXingFLiuJYipCCPoonRWTsoiHWLoSKChanKHPoonVKChanWMIpJDCaiJPChengVCChenHHuiCKYuenKYA familial cluster of pneumonia associated with the 2019 novel coronavirus indicating person-to-person transmission: a study of a family cluster20203951022351452310.1016/S0140-6736(20)30154-9ChenYLiuQGuoDEmerging coronaviruses: genome structure, replication, and pathogenesis202092441842310.1002/jmv.25681ChuDKWPanYChengSMSHuiKPYKrishnanPLiuYNgDYMWanCKCYangPWangQPeirisMPoonLLMMolecular diagnosis of a novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) causing an outbreak of pneumonia202066454955510.1093/clinchem/hvaa029CormanVMLandtOKaiserMMolenkampRMeijerAChuDKBleickerTBruninkSSchneiderJSchmidtMLMuldersDGHaagmansBLVan der VeerBVan den BrinkSWijsmanLGoderskiGRometteJLEllisJZambonMPeirisMGoossensHReuskenCKoopmansMPDrostenCDetection of 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) by real-time RT-PCR2020253200004510.2807/1560-7917.ES.2020.25.3.2000045Coronavirus Resource CenterJohns Hopkins Coronavirus Resource Center2020https://coronavirus.jhu.edu/us-mapCuiJLiFShiZLOrigin and evolution of pathogenic coronaviruses201917318119210.1038/s41579-018-0118-9DaviesNGKlepacPLiuYPremKJitMEggoRMCmmid Covid-working groupAge-dependent effects in the transmission and control of COVID-19 epidemics202026812051211De WildeAHSnijderEJKikkertMVan HemertMJHost factors in coronavirus replication2018419142De WitEVan DoremalenNFalzaranoDMunsterVJSARS and MERS: recent insights into emerging coronaviruses201614852353410.1038/nrmicro.2016.81DrewDANguyenLHStevesCJMenniCFreydinMVarsavskyTSudreCHCardosoMJOurselinSWolfJSpectorTDChanATConsortiumCopeRapid implementation of mobile technology for real-time epidemiology of COVID-19202036864971362136710.1126/science.abc0473DuLHeYZhouYLiuSZhengBJJiangSThe spike protein of SARS-CoV—a target for vaccine and therapeutic development20097322623610.1038/nrmicro2090EmamiAJavanmardiFPirbonyehNAkbariAPrevalence of underlying diseases in hospitalized patients with COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis202081e35FangLKarakiulakisGRothMAre patients with hypertension and diabetes mellitus at increased risk for COVID-19 infection?202084e2110.1016/S2213-2600(20)30116-8GaoXZhouHWuCXiaoYRenLParanhos-BaccalaGGuoLWangJAntibody against nucleocapsid protein predicts susceptibility to human coronavirus infection2015715599602GaugerPCVincentALSerum virus neutralization assay for detection and quantitation of serum neutralizing antibodies to influenza A virus in Swine20202123321333GuanWJNiZYHuYLiangWHOuCQHeJXLiuLShanHLeiCLHuiDSCDuBLiLJZengGYuenKYChenRCTangCLWangTChenPYXiangJLiSYWangJLLiangZJPengYXWeiLLiuYHuYHPengPWangJMLiuJYChenZLiGZhengZJQiuSQLuoJYeCJZhuSYZhongNSCovid China Medical Treatment Expert Group for Covid-19Clinical characteristics of coronavirus disease 2019 in China20203821817081720GuoYRCaoQDHongZSTanYYChenSDJinHJTanKSWangDYYanYThe origin, transmission and clinical therapies on coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak—an update on the status20207111HarringtonACoxBSnowdonJBakstJLeyEGrajalesPMaggioreJKahnSMcAdamAJComparison of abbott ID now and abbott m2000 methods for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 from nasopharyngeal and nasal swabs from symptomatic patients2020588e798-2010.1128/JCM.00798-20HongTCMaiQLCuongDVParidaMMinekawaHNotomiTHasebeFMoritaKDevelopment and evaluation of a novel loop-mediated isothermal amplification method for rapid detection of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus20044251956196110.1128/JCM.42.5.1956-1961.2004HuangCWangYLiXRenLZhaoJHuYZhangLFanGXuJGuXChengZYuTXiaJWeiYWuWXieXYinWLiHLiuMXiaoYGaoHGuoLXieJWangGJiangRGaoZJinQWangJCaoBClinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China20203951022349750610.1016/S0140-6736(20)30183-5HussainABhowmikBDo Vale MoreiraNCCOVID-19 and diabetes: knowledge in progress202016210814210.1016/j.diabres.2020.108142InfantinoMGrossiVLariBBambiRPerriAManneschiMTerenziGLiottiICiottaGTaddeiCBenucciMCaspriniPVenezianiFFabbriSPompettiAManfrediMDiagnostic accuracy of an automated chemiluminescent immunoassay for anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgM and IgG antibodies: an Italian experience202092916711675JiangSHillyerCDuLNeutralizing antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 and other human coronaviruses202041535535910.1016/j.it.2020.03.007KoczulaKMGallottaALateral flow assays201660111112010.1042/EBC20150012KoorakiSHosseinyMMyersLGholamrezanezhadACoronavirus (COVID-19) outbreak: what the department of radiology should know202017444745110.1016/j.jacr.2020.02.008KreutzRAlgharablyEAEAziziMDobrowolskiPGuzikTJanuszewiczAPersuAPrejbiszARiemerTGWangJGBurnierMHypertension, the renin–angiotensin system, and the risk of lower respiratory tract infections and lung injury: implications for COVID-192020116101688169910.1093/cvr/cvaa097KubinaRDziedzicAMolecular and serological tests for COVID-19 a comparative review of SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus laboratory and point-of-care diagnostics202010643410.3390/diagnostics10060434La MarcaACapuzzoMPagliaTRoliLTrentiTNelsonSMTesting for SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19): a systematic review and clinical guide to molecular and serological in-vitro diagnostic assays2020413483499LambLEBartoloneSNWardEChancellorMBRapid detection of novel coronavirus/severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) by reverse transcription-loop-mediated isothermal amplification2020156e023468210.1371/journal.pone.0234682LauerSAGrantzKHBiQJonesFKZhengQMeredithHRAzmanASReichNGLesslerJThe incubation period of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) from publicly reported confirmed cases: estimation and application2020172957758210.7326/M20-0504LeeMHarrisonBALewisGEJrA rapid sporozoite ELISA using 3,3′,5,5′-tetramethylbenzidine as the substrate chromogen1990424314319LiQGuanXWuPWangXZhouLTongYRenRLeungKSMLauEHYWongJYXingXXiangNWuYLiCChenQLiDLiuTZhaoJLiuMTuWChenCJinLYangRWangQZhouSWangRLiuHLuoYLiuYShaoGLiHTaoZYangYDengZLiuBMaZZhangYShiGLamTTYWuJTGaoGFCowlingBJYangBLeungGMFengZEarly transmission dynamics in Wuhan, China, of novel coronavirus-infected pneumonia20203821311991207LiDYingYWuJNiessnerRKnoppDComparison of monomeric and polymeric horseradish peroxidase as labels in competitive ELISA for small molecule detection2013180711717LippiGHenryBMChronic obstructive pulmonary disease is associated with severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)202016710594110.1016/j.rmed.2020.105941LiuJZhengXTongQLiWWangBSutterKTrillingMLuMDittmerUYangDOverlapping and discrete aspects of the pathology and pathogenesis of the emerging human pathogenic coronaviruses SARS-CoV, MERS-CoV, and 2019-nCoV202092549149410.1002/jmv.25709LuRZhaoXLiJNiuPYangBWuHWangWSongHHuangBZhuNBiYMaXZhanFWangLHuTZhouHHuZZhouWZhaoLChenJMengYWangJLinYYuanJXieZMaJLiuWJWangDXuWHolmesECGaoGFWuGChenWShiWTanWGenomic characterisation and epidemiology of 2019 novel coronavirus: implications for virus origins and receptor binding20203951022456557410.1016/S0140-6736(20)30251-8MadersbacherSBergerPDouble wavelength measurement of 3,3′,5,5′-tetramethylbenzidine (TMB) provides a three-fold enhancement of the ELISA measuring range19911381121124MagamboKAKalluvyaSEKapoorSWSeniJChofleAAFitzgeraldDWDownsJAUtility of urine and serum lateral flow assays to determine the prevalence and predictors of cryptococcal antigenemia in HIV-positive outpatients beginning antiretroviral therapy in Mwanza, Tanzania20141719040MaximLDNieboRUtellMJScreening tests: a review with examples2014261381182810.3109/08958378.2014.955932MenniCValdesAMFreidinMBSudreCHNguyenLHDrewDAGaneshSVarsavskyTCardosoMJEl-Sayed MoustafaJSViscontiAHysiPBowyerRCEManginoMFalchiMWolfJOurselinSChanATStevesCJSpectorTDReal-time tracking of self-reported symptoms to predict potential COVID-19202026710371040MorenoMLCebollaAMunoz-SuanoACarrillo-CarrionCCominoIPizarroALeonFRodriguez-HerreraASousaCDetection of gluten immunogenic peptides in the urine of patients with coeliac disease reveals transgressions in the gluten-free diet and incomplete mucosal healing2017662250257MuniyappaRGubbiSCOVID-19 pandemic, coronaviruses, and diabetes mellitus20203185E736E74110.1152/ajpendo.00124.2020MuruatoAEFontes-GarfiasCRRenPGarcia-BlancoMAMenacheryVDXieXShiPYA high-throughput neutralizing antibody assay for COVID-19 diagnosis and vaccine evaluation202010.1101/2020.05.21.109546NaoNShiratoKKatanoHMatsuyamaSTakedaMDetection of second case of 2019-nCoV infection in Japan2020TokyoNational Institute of Infectious Diseaseshttps://www.niid.go.jp/niid/en/2019-ncov-e/9334-ncov-vir3-2.htmlNielsenKYuWLKellyLBermudezRRenteriaTDajerAGutierrezEWilliamsJAlgireJDe EschaideSTDevelopment of a lateral flow assay for rapid detection of bovine antibody to Anaplasma marginale2008291101810.1080/15321810701734693NiuPLuRZhaoLWangHHuangBYeFWangWTanWThree novel real-time RT-PCR assays for detection of COVID-19 virus202022545345710.46234/ccdcw2020.116NotomiTOkayamaHMasubuchiHYonekawaTWatanabeKAminoNHaseTLoop-mediated isothermal amplification of DNA20002812e6310.1093/nar/28.12.e63PanYLiXYangGFanJTangYZhaoJLongXGuoSZhaoZLiuYHuHXueHLiYSerological immunochromatographic approach in diagnosis with SARS-CoV-2 infected COVID-19 patients2020811e28e3210.1016/j.jinf.2020.03.051ParoloCDe la Escosura-MunizAMerkociAEnhanced lateral flow immunoassay using gold nanoparticles loaded with enzymes2013401412416PujadasEChaudhryFMcBrideRRichterFZhaoSWajnbergANadkarniGGlicksbergBSHouldsworthJCordon-CardoCSARS-CoV-2 viral load predicts COVID-19 mortality202089e7010.1016/S2213-2600(20)30354-4RohrmanBALeautaudVMolyneuxERichards-KortumRRA lateral flow assay for quantitative detection of amplified HIV-1 RNA201279e4561110.1371/journal.pone.0045611SchiffrinELFlackJMItoSMuntnerPWebbRCHypertension and COVID-19202033537337410.1093/ajh/hpaa057SchrammECStatenNRZhangZBruceSSKellnerCAtkinsonJPKyttarisVCTsokosGCPetriMConnollyESOlsonPKA quantitative lateral flow assay to detect complement activation in blood20154777885SethuramanNJeremiahSSRyoAInterpreting diagnostic tests for SARS-CoV-220203232222492251ShenCWangZZhaoFYangYLiJYuanJWangFLiDYangMXingLWeiJXiaoHYangYQuJQingLChenLXuZPengLLiYZhengHChenFHuangKJiangYLiuDZhangZLiuYLiuLTreatment of 5 critically Ill patients with COVID-19 with convalescent plasma20203231615821589SohrabiCAlsafiZO’NeillNKhanMKerwanAAl-JabirAIosifidisCAghaRWorld Health Organization declares global emergency: a review of the 2019 novel coronavirus (COVID-19)202076717610.1016/j.ijsu.2020.02.034SongZXuYBaoLZhangLYuPQuYZhuHZhaoWHanYQinCFrom SARS to MERS, thrusting coronaviruses into the spotlight20191111110.3390/v11010059The COVID-19 Investigation TeamClinical and virologic characteristics of the first 12 patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in the United States202026686186810.1038/s41591-020-0877-5TianSHuNLouJChenKKangXXiangZChenHWangDLiuNLiuDChenGZhangYLiDLiJLianHNiuSZhangLZhangJCharacteristics of COVID-19 infection in Beijing202080440140610.1016/j.jinf.2020.02.018ToKKTsangOTLeungWSTamARWuTCLungDCYipCCCaiJPChanJMChikTSLauDPChoiCYChenLLChanWMChanKHIpJDNgACPoonRWLuoCTChengVCChanJFHungIFChenZChenHYuenKYTemporal profiles of viral load in posterior oropharyngeal saliva samples and serum antibody responses during infection by SARS-CoV-2: an observational cohort study202020556557410.1016/S1473-3099(20)30196-1U.S. Food & Drug AdministrationImportant Information on the Use of Serological (Antibody) Tests for COVID-19 - Letter to Health Care Providers2020https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/letters-health-care-providers/important-information-use-serological-antibody-tests-covid-19-letter-health-care-providersWangCHorbyPWHaydenFGGaoGFA novel coronavirus outbreak of global health concern20203951022347047310.1016/S0140-6736(20)30185-9WangDHuBHuCZhuFLiuXZhangJWangBXiangHChengZXiongYZhaoYLiYWangXPengZClinical characteristics of 138 hospitalized patients with 2019 novel coronavirus-infected pneumonia in Wuhan, China20203231110611069WangDYuJWangYZhangMLiPLiuMLiuYDevelopment of a real-time loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) assay and visual LAMP assay for detection of African swine fever virus (ASFV)202027611377510.1016/j.jviromet.2019.113775WeiYLuYXiaLYuanXLiGLiXLiuLLiuWZhouPWangCYZhangHAnalysis of 2019 novel coronavirus infection and clinical characteristics of outpatients: an epidemiological study from a fever clinic in Wuhan, China2020140203015410.1002/jmv.26175WongHYFLamHYSFongAHLeungSTChinTWLoCSYLuiMMLeeJCYChiuKWChungTLeeEYPWanEYFHungFNILamTPWKuoMNgMYFrequency and distribution of chest radiographic findings in COVID-19 positive patients20202962201160World Health OrganizationCOVID-19 symptoms2020https://www.who.int/health-topics/coronavirus#tab=tab_3WuFZhaoSYuBChenYMWangWSongZGHuYTaoZWTianJHPeiYYYuanMLZhangYLDaiFHLiuYWangQMZhengJJXuLHolmesECZhangYZA new coronavirus associated with human respiratory disease in China2020579779826526910.1038/s41586-020-2008-3XiaJTongJLiuMShenYGuoDEvaluation of coronavirus in tears and conjunctival secretions of patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection202092658959410.1002/jmv.25725XiangFWangXHeXPengZYangBZhangJZhouQYeHMaYLiHWeiXCaiPMaWLAntibody detection and dynamic characteristics in patients with COVID-19Epub ahead of print 19 April 2020202010.1093/cid/ciaa461XiangJYanMLiHLiuTLinCHuangSShenCEvaluation of enzyme-linked immunoassay and colloidal gold- immunochromatographic assay kit for detection of novel coronavirus (SARS-Cov-2) causing an outbreak of pneumonia (COVID-19)202010.1101/2020.02.27.20028787YangWSirajuddinAZhangXLiuGTengZZhaoSLuMThe role of imaging in 2019 novel coronavirus pneumonia (COVID-19)202030948744882YangPWangXCOVID-19: a new challenge for human beings202017555555710.1038/s41423-020-0407-xYangJZhangYProtein structure and function prediction using I‐TASSER20155215.8.15.8.1510.1002/0471250953.bi0508s52YuLWuSHaoXDongXMaoLPelechanoVChenWHYinXRapid detection of COVID-19 coronavirus using a reverse transcriptional loop-mediated isothermal amplification (RT-LAMP) diagnostic platform202066797597710.1093/clinchem/hvaa102ZhangYBrooksWAGoswamiDRahmanMLubySPErdmanDDA duplex recombinant viral nucleoprotein microbead immunoassay for simultaneous detection of seroresponses to human respiratory syncytial virus and metapneumovirus infections20142065562ZhangZChenZWangSChengFChenLIodine-mediated etching of gold nanorods for plasmonic ELISA based on colorimetric detection of alkaline phosphatase20157502763927645ZhangWDuRHLiBZhengXSYangXLHuBWangYYXiaoGFYanBShiZLZhouPMolecular and serological investigation of 2019-nCoV infected patients: implication of multiple shedding routes20209138638910.1080/22221751.2020.1729071ZhangPGaoQWangTKeYMoFJiaRLiuWLiuLZhengSLiuYLiLWangYXuLHaoKYangRLiSLinCZhaoYEvaluation of recombinant nucleocapsid and spike proteins for serological diagnosis of novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)202010.1101/2020.03.17.20036954Zhang LabGenome-wide structure and function modeling of SARS-CoV-22020https://zhanglab.ccmb.med.umich.edu/COVID-19/ZhouPYangXLWangXGHuBZhangLZhangWSiHRZhuYLiBHuangCLChenHDChenJLuoYGuoHJiangRDLiuMQChenYShenXRWangXZhengXSZhaoKChenQJDengFLiuLLYanBZhanFXWangYYXiaoGFShiZLA pneumonia outbreak associated with a new coronavirus of probable bat origin2020579779827027310.1038/s41586-020-2012-7ZhuNZhangDWangWLiXYangBSongJZhaoXHuangBShiWLuRNiuPZhanFMaXWangDXuWWuGGaoGFTanWInvestigating China novel coronavirus, and team research: a novel coronavirus from patients with pneumonia in China, 201920203288727733