Ann Gregory @gregory_annc 1887 days ago

RT @phantomBugs: Ever needed a citation for something like - "MAGs are a pretty good estimate of genomes in the environment, but commonly m…

Somak @soilmicrobe 1887 days ago

RT @phantomBugs: Ever needed a citation for something like - "MAGs are a pretty good estimate of genomes in the environment, but commonly m…

Susheel Busi @susheelbusi 1887 days ago

RT @phantomBugs: Ever needed a citation for something like - "MAGs are a pretty good estimate of genomes in the environment, but commonly m…

Yanxian Li @li_yanxian 1887 days ago

RT @phantomBugs: Ever needed a citation for something like - "MAGs are a pretty good estimate of genomes in the environment, but commonly m…

Riitta Nissinen @Riittamarita 1887 days ago

From Nelson et al in PeerJ: "..reconstructed genomes can be considered reliable foundations for metabolic reconstruction but should not be assumed to be comprehensive for the function of the organism.." https://t.co/aEjLOXup2h

Rika Anderson @RikaEAnderson 1887 days ago

RT @phantomBugs: Ever needed a citation for something like - "MAGs are a pretty good estimate of genomes in the environment, but commonly m…

Tessa Pierce, PhD @saltyscientist 1887 days ago

RT @phantomBugs: Ever needed a citation for something like - "MAGs are a pretty good estimate of genomes in the environment, but commonly m…

Javier del Campo @fonamental 1887 days ago

Biases in genome reconstruction from metagenomic data https://t.co/REkiS8rzmW

Bradley Tolar @Tolarchaeota 1887 days ago

RT @phantomBugs: Ever needed a citation for something like - "MAGs are a pretty good estimate of genomes in the environment, but commonly m…

tom delmont @tomodelmont 1887 days ago

RT @phantomBugs: Ever needed a citation for something like - "MAGs are a pretty good estimate of genomes in the environment, but commonly m…

Mandy **Mask up ** VOTE early ** Joye @SeepExplorer 1887 days ago

Biases in genome reconstruction from metagenomic data [PeerJ] https://t.co/izt9LBdgk6

Phil Hugenholtz @PhilHugenholtz 1887 days ago

RT @phantomBugs: Ever needed a citation for something like - "MAGs are a pretty good estimate of genomes in the environment, but commonly m…

Jackie Goordial @JackieGoordial 1887 days ago

RT @phantomBugs: Ever needed a citation for something like - "MAGs are a pretty good estimate of genomes in the environment, but commonly m…

Michael.Tangherlini @MichaelTangher1 1887 days ago

RT @phantomBugs: Ever needed a citation for something like - "MAGs are a pretty good estimate of genomes in the environment, but commonly m…

Jordan Russell, Ph.D @russelltyjor 1887 days ago

RT @phantomBugs: Ever needed a citation for something like - "MAGs are a pretty good estimate of genomes in the environment, but commonly m…

A. Murat Eren (Meren) @merenbey 1887 days ago

RT @phantomBugs: Ever needed a citation for something like - "MAGs are a pretty good estimate of genomes in the environment, but commonly m…

Ben Tully @phantomBugs 1887 days ago

Ever needed a citation for something like - "MAGs are a pretty good estimate of genomes in the environment, but commonly miss several genomic features"? Look no further! From @wichne and @jmo_sciences "Biases in genome reconstruction from metagenomic data" https://t.co/N5UVckmd1v

Bill Nelson @wichne 1887 days ago

As the Professor would say, "Good news, everyone!" Our paper on where metagenomic binning goes awry (and that it can be pretty reliable) is out in @thePeerJ https://t.co/zULy8FEeUU. Thanks to @jmo_sciences and @DeepSeaSith for their work on this marathon.